首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

经胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺手术与传统甲状腺手术的疗效对比
引用本文:张 轶,李正凯,李洪涛,韩晓鹏,苏 琳,刘宏斌.经胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺手术与传统甲状腺手术的疗效对比[J].现代肿瘤医学,2015,0(24):3585-3588.
作者姓名:张 轶  李正凯  李洪涛  韩晓鹏  苏 琳  刘宏斌
作者单位:1.兰州大学第二临床医学院,甘肃 兰州 730000; 2.兰州军区兰州总医院,甘肃 兰州 730050
摘    要:目的:对比经胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺手术与传统甲状腺手术的临床疗效,探讨经胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺手术的可行性和优势。方法:回顾性分析了2011年12月至2014年3月收治的314例接受手术治疗的甲状腺良性肿瘤患者的临床资料,其中腔镜组78例,行经胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺手术;开放组236例,行传统开放性甲状腺手术。采用统计学方法对两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后第一天引流量、使用止痛药物情况、术后并发症、术后住院时间情况进行对比分析,并进行术后随访。结果:腔镜组手术时间为(82.0±23.5)min,长于开放组(57.7±13.7)min,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);腔镜组术中出血量(13.9±7.6)ml低于开放组(33.9±15.4)ml,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);术后第一天出血量(22.3±8.7)ml少于开放组(36.0±17.8)ml,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);术后住院时间分别为(2.4±0.9)天和(3.6±1.2)天,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);腔镜组患者术后使用止痛药的比例小于开放组;腔镜组术后无严重并发症,并发症发生率与开放组无差异且均较低,术后随访半年,未出现甲状腺功能减退和复发。结论:经胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺手术是一种安全、可靠的手术方式,具有出血少、住院时间短、疼痛轻和颈部无疤痕等优势。

关 键 词:胸乳入路  腔镜甲状腺手术  开放甲状腺手术  手术治疗

Comparative study between conventional open thyroidectomy and endoscopic thyroidec-tomy by trans -thoracoareolar approach
Zhang Yi,Li Zhengkai,Li Hongtao,Han Xiaopeng,Su Lin,Liu Hongbin.Comparative study between conventional open thyroidectomy and endoscopic thyroidec-tomy by trans -thoracoareolar approach[J].Journal of Modern Oncology,2015,0(24):3585-3588.
Authors:Zhang Yi  Li Zhengkai  Li Hongtao  Han Xiaopeng  Su Lin  Liu Hongbin
Institution:1.Lanzhou University Second Hospital,Gansu Lanzhou 730000,China;2.Lanzhou General Hospital of Lanzhou Military Area,Gansu Lanzhou 730050,China.
Abstract:Objective:To compare the clinical efficiency of endoscopic thyroidectomy by trans-thoracoareolar approach with conventional open thyroidectomy,to explore the feasibility and advantage of endoscopic thyroidectomy.Methods:The clinical data of 314 cases of benign thyroid tumor patients who treated with surgery from December 2011 to March 2014 were analyzed retrospectively(endoscopy group:78 cases of endoscopic thyroidectomy by trans-thoracoareolar approach,open group:236 cases of conventional open thyroidectomy,).Operative time,blood loss,the volume of drainage in the first day after operation,use of painkillers,postoperative complications,time of postoperative stay and postoperative follow-up studies were compared.Results:The operation time in group endoscopy was(82.0±23.5)min,longer than open group(57.7±13.7)min,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The blood loss of endoscopy group was (13.9±7.6)ml,much less than the open group(33.9±15.4)ml,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01).The volume of drainage in the first day after operation of group endoscopy was(22.3±8.7)ml,less than open group(36.0±17.8)ml,the difference was significant(P<0.01).The postoperative stay of endoscopy group was(2.4±0.9)d,less than open group(3.6±1.2)d,the difference was significant(P<0.01).The use of painkillers in endoscopy group was less than open group.The postoperative complications,time of postoperative stay and postoperative follow-up studies were both low in the two groups,and the differences were not statistically significant.Conclusion:Endoscopic thyroidectomy by trans-thoracoareolar approach is a safe and feasible method.The advantages of endoscopic thyroidectomy by trans-thoracoareolar approach were less blood loss,less time of postoperative stay,less pain and no scar on the neck.
Keywords:trans-thoracoareolar approach  endoscopic thyroidectomy  conventional open thyroidectomy  surgical treatment
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《现代肿瘤医学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《现代肿瘤医学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号