Relationship Between Interatrial Conduction Times and Left Atrial Dimension in Patients Undergoing Atrioventricular Stimulation

Interatrial conduction time (IACT) and left atrial dimension (LAD) were determined in 75 patients (41 males, 34 females, mean age 78.2 ± 7,9 years) undergoing atrioventricular (AV) stimulation. The LAD was measured by M mode echocardiography as the distance between the posterior aortic wall and the posterior left atrial wall. The IACT was determined during a transvenous dual chamber pacemaker implant done under local anesthesia (lidocaine). The spontaneous interatrial conduction time (SIACT) was measured from the intrinsic deflection (ID) of the right atrium recorded in a unipolar mode (unipolar J-shaped had positioned in the right appendage) to the ID of the left atrium (bipolar esophageal lead, left atrial positive deflection equal to the negative one) during sinus rhythm. The right atrium then was paced at a rate slightly greater than the spontaneous one. The paced interatrial conduction time (PIACT) was measured from the stimulus artifact to the left atrial ID. The PIACT was also measured during incremental right atrial pacing (10 beats/min step increase to 180 beats/min) and, from these measurements, the maximum increase of PIACT (MIPIACT) was deduced. The LAD was measured at 39.5 ± 8.7 mm, SIACT at 70.3 ± 24.8 msec, PIACT at 118.8 ± 27.9 msec, and MIPIACT at 16.5 ± 16.4 msec. We found highly significant relationships between SIACT and LAD(P = 0.0006, r - 0.39), PIACT and LAD (P = 0.0001, r = 0.45), and MIPIACT and LAD (P = 0.0006, r = 0.38). We also noted that the LAD was greater in patients in whom MIPIACT was >10 msec than in patients in whom the MIPIACT was negligible (P < 0.002). However, the “r” values indicate that IACT is probably determined by multiple factors, and LAD appears to be one of the most important. Thus, we demonstrated the existence of highly significant relationships between the LAD determined by M mode echocardiography and the IACT when sensing and pacing the right atrium. We also demonstrated that the LAD was greater in patients in whom PIACT increased by an appreciable duration during fast atrial pacing. These results must be kept in mind when choosing a mode of stimulation and determining the AV delay (dual chamber pacemaker), particularly in patients with left atrial enlargement in whom the contribution of the atrial contraction and its timing are hemodynamically determinant.