| 聚焦超声与微波治疗宫颈糜烂疗效的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张爱香. 聚焦超声与微波治疗宫颈糜烂疗效的比较[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2007, 24(8A): 21-22 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张爱香 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖北省妇幼保健院妇产科,武汉430073 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的观察比较聚焦超声与微波治疗宫颈糜烂的临床疗效。方法选择180例宫颈糜烂患者，随机分为聚焦超声治疗组（观察组）、微波治疗组（对照组）各90例，两组于治疗后观察1～3个月，评估疗效。结果两组愈合情况比较无显著性差异（P〉0．05），两组阴道出血量和出血时间比较有显著性差异（P〈0．01）。结论聚焦超声治疗宫颈糜烂是一种安全有效的方法。
|
| 关 键 词： | 宫颈糜烂 聚焦超声 微波 治疗效果 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-9993（2007）8A-0021-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-09-26 |
Focal Ultrasound and Microwave in Treatment of Cervical Erosion:A Comparison of Outcomes |
| |
| ZHANG Ai-xiang. Focal Ultrasound and Microwave in Treatment of Cervical Erosion:A Comparison of Outcomes[J]. Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army, 2007, 24(8A): 21-22 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Ai-xiang |
| |
| Affiliation: | Hubei Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Wuhan 430070,China |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To observe and compare the clinical outcomes between the focal ultrasound and microwave methods in treatment of cervical erosion.Methods A total of 180 patients with cerical erosion were evenly randomized into focal ultrasound(observation group) and microwave groups(control group).The treatment outcomes were evaluated after 1-3 months.Results There was no difference in curative rates between the 2 groups(P>0.05),but there were significant differences in the amount and lasting time of vaginal bleeding(P<0.05).Conclusion Focal ultrasound is a safe and effective treatment for cervical erosion. |
| |
| Keywords: | cervical erosion focal ultrasound microwave treatment outcome |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
