Suspected invasive placenta: evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging |
| |
Authors: | Laurence Bour Vinciane Placé Sandra Bendavid Yann Fargeaudou Jean-Jacques Portal Aude Ricbourg Delphine Sebbag Anthony Dohan Eric Vicaut Philippe Soyer |
| |
Institution: | 1. Department of Abdominal and Interventional Imaging, H?pital Lariboisière-AP-HP, 2 rue Ambroise Paré, 75475, Paris cedex 10, France 2. Department of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, H?pital Lariboisière-AP-HP, 2 rue Ambroise Paré, 75475, Paris cedex 10, France 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, H?pital Lariboisière-AP-HP, 2 rue Ambroise Paré, 75475, Paris cedex 10, France 4. Diderot-Paris 7 University-Sorbonne Paris-Cité, 10 Avenue de Verdun, 75010, Paris, France
|
| |
Abstract: | Purpose To determine the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing invasive placenta (IP). Materials and methods MRI findings in 32 women with suspected IP were evaluated independently by four readers. Interobserver agreement was calculated with kappa (κ) statistics. Associations between MRI findings and IP were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of IP were estimated. Results Sixteen women (16/32; 50 %) had confirmed IP. Interobserver correlation for the diagnosis of IP was fair (κ?=?0.40). Univariate analysis revealed that thinning or focal defect of the uteroplacental interface (P?0.0001) was the most discriminating MRI variable in the differentiation between normal and IP. Overall sensitivity and specificity of MRI for the diagnosis of IP were 84 % 95 % CI: 75–94 %] and 80 % 95 % CI: 66–93 %], respectively. Thinning or focal defect of the uteroplacental interface was the most accurate finding (88 %) in the diagnosis of IP. Multivariate analysis revealed that thinning or focal defect of the uteroplacental interface was the single independent predictor of IP (P?=?0.0006; OR?=?64.99). Conclusion MR imaging has 84 % sensitivity 95 % CI: 75–94 %] and 80 % specificity 95 % CI: 66–93 %] for the diagnosis of IP. Thinning or focal defect of the uteroplacental interface is the most discriminating independent MR variable in differentiating between normal placenta and IP. Key points ? MR imaging has acceptable degrees of accuracy to diagnose invasive placenta. ? Focal uteroplacental interface defect is the best finding to diagnose invasive placenta. ? Focal uteroplacental interface defect is the single independent predictor of invasive placenta. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|