|
|||||
|
|
| 愈合期埋植型和非埋植型种植体周围牙槽骨吸收情况观察 | |
| 引用本文： | 薛丽丽,杜莉,王虎,淡子航. 愈合期埋植型和非埋植型种植体周围牙槽骨吸收情况观察[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2009, 14(3): 60-62,67 |
| 作者姓名： | 薛丽丽 杜莉 王虎 淡子航 |
| 作者单位： | 1. 四川大学华西口腔医院修复科,610041 2. 四川大学华西口腔医院放射科 3. 四川大学华西口腔医院修复科 |
| 摘 要： | 目的：观察比较愈合期两段式埋植型和非埋植型种植体周围牙槽骨吸收情况是否存在差异。方法：收集种植义齿修复下颌后牙区牙体缺损患者44例共94颗，其中54颗两段式埋植型Frialit-2种植体和40颗两段式非埋植型ITI种植体，根据种植体植入术后和愈合后数字化全景X线片来进行种植体周围牙槽骨高度的测量。结果：显示愈合期两段式埋植型Frialit-2种植体和非埋植型ITI种植体周围骨吸收值不存在统计学差异（p=0．667〉0．05）。结论：在本实验条件下，愈合期埋植型和非埋植型种植体周围牙槽骨骨吸收改变与种植体的植入方式无关。 |
| 关 键 词： | 埋植型种植体 非埋植型种植体 愈合期 骨吸收 数字化全景X线片 |
The observation of the level of crestal bone around submerged and non-submerged implant during healing period |
|
| Affiliation: | XUE Lib, DU Li, WANG Hu, et al(1. Dept. of Prosthodontics, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China ;2. Dept. of Radiology, West China College of Stomatology, Siehuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China) |
| Abstract: | The aim of this study is to observe and compare the level of peri-implant alveolar bone loss of the one-stage,non submerged dental implants and two-stage,submerged dental implants during unloaded period. Methods： 44 patients （54 Frialit-2 implants and 40 ITI implants）. The peri- implant alveolar bone was observed and measured with digital panoramic radiograph at the time of insertion and healing. Results： The values of crestal bone height were compared between submerged implants and non-submerged implants, no significant difference was found （p =0.667 〉0.05）. Conclusion： The submerged implant and non-submerged implant exhibited similar change of crestal bone around peri-implant during healing period, The change seems not to be associated with installation modality. |
| Keywords: | one-stage,non-submerged implant two-stage,submerged implant healing period alveolar bone loss digital panoramic radiograph. |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |