首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

腹腔镜鞘膜内和辅助阴式子宫切除术的疗效分析
引用本文:吉家銮. 腹腔镜鞘膜内和辅助阴式子宫切除术的疗效分析[J]. 海南医学院学报, 2009, 15(9): 1147-1148,1151
作者姓名:吉家銮
作者单位:海南省东方市人民医院妇产科,海南,东方,572600
基金项目:海南医学院科研基金资助学报项目 
摘    要:目的:评价腹腔镜鞘膜内子宫切除术(LISH)和腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)2种术式的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析妇产科2007年6月~2008年12月分别行LISH和LAVH的140例患者,在手术时间、出血量、术后恢复等方面情况。结果:平均手术时间、术中平均出血量、术后性欲降低方面LISH组与LAVH组比,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);术后使用抗生素时间、术后住院时间、术后疼痛及术后恢复日常活动时间LISH组与LAVH组比,均差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论:LISH和LAVH两种术式均为腹腔镜下子宫切除的有效术式,且各有利弊;应根据患者的具体情况选择适宜术式。

关 键 词:腹腔镜  子宫切除术  子宫疾病

Comparison of laparoscopic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy
JI Jia-luan. Comparison of laparoscopic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy[J]. Journal of Hainan Medical College, 2009, 15(9): 1147-1148,1151
Authors:JI Jia-luan
Affiliation:JI Jia-luan (Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics , Dongfang People's Hospital, Dongfang 572600, China)
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate laparoscopic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy(LISH) and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy(LAVH).Methods:Retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 140 patients who underwent LISH and LAVH between June 2007 and December 2008 in our hospital,the operation time,blood loss and postoperative recovery were studied.Results:Compared patients undergoing LAVH and LISH for mean operative time,average amount of bleeding,and libido decline,the differences were significant(P<0.05);compared patients who underwent LAVH and LISH for postoperative use of antibiotics,postoperative hospitalization time,postoperative pain and resumption of daily activities,the differences were not significant(P>0.05).Conclusion:Both LISH and LAVH are effective surgical procedures with advantages and disadvantages,which may be used according to the concrete conditions of patients.
Keywords:Laparoscopy  Hysterectomy  Hysterectomy
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号