首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

三种代谢综合征诊断标准在北京某国有企业体检员工中应用的比较
引用本文:李尔曼,马爱娟,刘爱萍,王培玉,李明. 三种代谢综合征诊断标准在北京某国有企业体检员工中应用的比较[J]. 中华健康管理学杂志, 2010, 0(3): 164-167
作者姓名:李尔曼  马爱娟  刘爱萍  王培玉  李明
作者单位:[1]中国石油天然气集团公司中心医院,河北廊坊065000 [2]北京大学医学部公共卫生学院社会医学与健康教育系 ,河北廊坊065000 [3]中华预防医学会健康风险评估与控制专业委员会,河北廊坊065000
摘    要:目的探讨三种代谢综合征(MS)诊断标准在北京某国有企业体检员工中应用的异同比较并提出建议。方法对1039例23~62岁的办公室人员进行现况调查,分别采用国际糖尿病联盟(IDF,2005)、美国国家胆固醇教育计划成人组第三次报告(ATPHI,2005)和中华医学会糖尿病分会(CDS,2004)标准计算MS患病率,比较三种标准在该人群中应用的一致性和差异。结果ATPm、IDF、CDS三种标准诊断的MS患病率依次为:14.8%、14.2%、10.7%。IDF与ATPⅢ标准一致性很高(Kappa=0.977)。CDS与IDF、CDS与ATPⅢ标准的一致性均一般,Kappa值分别为0.697、0.694。CDS标准诊断的非MS的人中有5.7%存在危险因素聚集。ATPⅢ、IDF标准诊断的MS者常见的表现形式为:中心性肥胖+高三酰甘油(TG)血症+血压异常和中心性肥胖+高TG血症+低高密度脂蛋白(HDL-C)血症;CDS标准常见的表现形式为中心性肥胖+高TG血症+高血压和中心性肥胖+高TG血症+血糖异常。结论三种MS诊断标准中,ATPⅢ标准对MS及危险因素聚集个体的检出率最高。IDF与ATPⅢ标准一致性高于IDF、ATPⅢ与CDS的一致性,但前两者仍存在不一致。CDS各组分的诊断标准有待于进一步改进。建议采用三种诊断标准,或两种诊断标准CDS与ATPⅢ或CDS与IDF比较,提高筛检的灵敏度,达到较好的干预效果。

关 键 词:代谢综合征X  高胆固醇血症  糖尿病  诊断

Use of different diagnostic criteria of metabolic syndrome in health check-up receivers from one state-owned enterprise in Beijing
LI Er-man,MA Ai-juan,LIU Ai-ping,WANG Pei-yu,LI Ming. Use of different diagnostic criteria of metabolic syndrome in health check-up receivers from one state-owned enterprise in Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Management, 2010, 0(3): 164-167
Authors:LI Er-man  MA Ai-juan  LIU Ai-ping  WANG Pei-yu  LI Ming
Affiliation:( Central Hospital of China Petroleum Group Company,Langfang 065000, China)
Abstract:Objective To compare the diagnostic criteria of metabolic syndrome (MS) developed by the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) in 2005, the 3th Report of National Cholesterol Education Program-Aduh Treatment PanelⅢ (NCEP-ATPⅢ) in 2005, and the Chinese Diabetes Society (CDS) in 2004. Methods A total of 1039 adults aged 23 to 62 year-old were enrolled in this epidemiological investigation to assess the prevalence of MS by above three definitions. Results The MS prevalence rate was 14. 8% ,14. 2% and 10.7% in ATP Ⅲ ,IDF, and CDS, respectively. The diagnoses agreement of IDF with ATP Ⅲ was stronger ( Kappa = 0. 912) than IDF with CDS ( Kappa = 0. 466) and ATP m with CDS ( Kappa =0. 504). CDS definition found 5.7% of non-MS individuals had risk factor accumulation. Those defined by ATP Ⅲ and IDF criteria were presented with central obesity + hypertriglyceridemia + abnormal blood pressure and central obesity + hypertriglyceridemia + low high-density lipoprotein hyperlipidemia. However, those defined by CDS criterion were commonly presented with obesity + hypertriglyceridemia + abnormal blood pressure or obesity + hypertriglyceridemia + hyperglycemia Conclusions The agreement of IDF and ATP Ⅲ definition was relatively stronger. For better screening sensitivity, those three criteria, or CDS and IDF criteria,or CDS and ATPⅢ criteria should be used together.
Keywords:Metabolic syndrome X  Hypercholesterolemia  Diabetes mellitus  Diagnosis
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号