首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Predictive model for distal junctional kyphosis after cervical deformity surgery
Authors:Peter G. Passias  Dennis Vasquez-Montes  Gregory W. Poorman  Themistocles Protopsaltis  Samantha R. Horn  Cole A. Bortz  Frank Segreto  Bassel Diebo  Chris Ames  Justin Smith  Virginie LaFage  Renaud LaFage  Eric Klineberg  Chris Shaffrey  Shay Bess  Frank Schwab
Abstract:

Background Context

Distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) is a primary concern of surgeons correcting cervical deformity. Identifying patients and procedures at higher risk of developing this condition is paramount in improving patient selection and care.

Purpose

The present study aimed to develop a risk index for DJK development in the first year after surgery.

Study Design/Setting

This is a retrospective review of a prospective multicenter cervical deformity database.

Patient Sample

Patients over the age of 18 meeting one of the following deformities were included in the study: cervical kyphosis (C2–7 Cobb angle>10°), cervical scoliosis (coronal Cobb angle>10°), positive cervical sagittal imbalance (C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA)>4?cm or T1-C6>10°), or horizontal gaze impairment (chin-brow vertical angle>25°).

Outcome Measures

Development of DJK at any time before 1 year.

Methods

Distal junctional kyphosis was defined by both clinical diagnosis (by enrolling surgeon) and post hoc identification of development of an angle

Results

Statistical analysis included 101 surgical patients (average age: 60.1 years, 58.3% female, body mass index: 30.2) undergoing long cervical deformity correction (mean levels fused: 7.1, osteotomy used: 49.5%, approach: 46.5% posterior, 17.8% anterior, 35.7% combined). In 2 years after surgery, 6% of patients were diagnosed with clinical DJK; however, 23.8% of patients met radiographic definition for DJK. Patients with neurologic symptoms were at risk of DJK (odds ratio [OR]: 3.71, confidence interval [CI]: 0.11–0.63). However, no significant relationship was found between osteoporosis, age, and ambulatory status with DJK incidence. Baseline radiographic malalignments were the most numerous and strong predictors for DJK: (1) C2-T1 tilt>5.33 (OR: 6.94, CI: 2.99–16.14); (2) kyphosis36.4 (OR: 5.6, CI: 2.28–13.57); (5) C2-C7 SVA>56.3° (OR: 5.4, CI: 2.20–13.23); and (6) C4_Tilt>56.7 (OR: 5.0, CI: 1.90–13.1). Clinically, combined approaches (OR: 2.67, CI: 1.21–5.89) and usage of Smith-Petersen osteotomy (OR: 2.55, CI: 1.02–6.34) were the most important predictors of DJK.

Conclusions

In a surgical cohort of patients with cervical deformity, we found a 23.8% incidence of DJK. Different procedures and patient malalignment predicted incidence of DJK up to 1 year. Preoperative T1 slope-cervical lordosis, cervical kyphosis, SVA, and cervical lordosis all strongly predicted DJK at specific cut-off points. Knowledge of these factors will potentially help direct future study and strategy aimed at minimizing this potentially dramatic occurrence.
Keywords:Cervical  Cervical alignment  Cervical deformity  Deformity  Distal junctional kyphosis  Outcomes  Sagittal malalignment  Surgery  Surgical correction
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号