Identification of putative estrogen receptor-mediated endocrine disrupting chemicals using QSAR- and structure-based virtual screening approaches |
| |
Authors: | Liying Zhang Alexander Sedykh Ashutosh Tripathi Hao Zhu Antreas Afantitis Varnavas D. Mouchlis Georgia Melagraki Ivan Rusyn Alexander Tropsha |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA;2. The Rutgers Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers University, Camden, NJ, USA;3. Department of Chemistry, Rutgers University, Camden, NJ, USA;4. NovaMechanics Ltd., Nicosia, Cyprus;5. Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Identification of endocrine disrupting chemicals is one of the important goals of environmental chemical hazard screening. We report on the development of validated in silico predictors of chemicals likely to cause estrogen receptor (ER)-mediated endocrine disruption to facilitate their prioritization for future screening. A database of relative binding affinity of a large number of ERα and/or ERβ ligands was assembled (546 for ERα and 137 for ERβ). Both single-task learning (STL) and multi-task learning (MTL) continuous quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models were developed for predicting ligand binding affinity to ERα or ERβ. High predictive accuracy was achieved for ERα binding affinity (MTL R2 = 0.71, STL R2 = 0.73). For ERβ binding affinity, MTL models were significantly more predictive (R2 = 0.53, p < 0.05) than STL models. In addition, docking studies were performed on a set of ER agonists/antagonists (67 agonists and 39 antagonists for ERα, 48 agonists and 32 antagonists for ERβ, supplemented by putative decoys/non-binders) using the following ER structures (in complexes with respective ligands) retrieved from the Protein Data Bank: ERα agonist (PDB ID: 1L2I), ERα antagonist (PDB ID: 3DT3), ERβ agonist (PDB ID: 2NV7), and ERβ antagonist (PDB ID: 1L2J). We found that all four ER conformations discriminated their corresponding ligands from presumed non-binders. Finally, both QSAR models and ER structures were employed in parallel to virtually screen several large libraries of environmental chemicals to derive a ligand- and structure-based prioritized list of putative estrogenic compounds to be used for in vitro and in vivo experimental validation. |
| |
Keywords: | AD, applicability domain ADMET, absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity AhR, aryl hydrocarbon receptor AR, androgen receptor AUC, area under the curve E2, 17β-estradiol ER, estrogen receptor EDCs, endocrine disrupting chemicals EDKB, endocrine disruptor knowledge base EDSP, endocrine disruptor screening program EF, enrichment factor EPA, US Environmental Protection Agency kNN, k-nearest neighbors MTL, multi-task learning PDB, Protein Data Bank QSAR, quantitative structure&ndash activity relationships RBA, relative binding affinity ROC, receiver operating characteristic RP, relative potency SE, sensitivity SP, specificity STL, single-task learning |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|