首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Effect of finger tracking combined with electrical stimulation on brain reorganization and hand function in subjects with stroke
Authors:Ela Bhatt  Ashima Nagpal  Kristine H Greer  Tiffany K Grunewald  Jennifer L Steele  Jeff W Wiemiller  Scott M Lewis  James R Carey
Institution:(1) Program in Physical Therapy and Program in Rehabilitation Science, MMC 388, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA;(2) Gillette Children’s Specialty Healthcare, Minnetonka, MN, USA;(3) Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA;(4) United Hospital, St Paul, MN, USA;(5) Institute for Athletic Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA;(6) Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA;(7) Brain Sciences Center (11B), VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Abstract:Synergism of rehabilitative interventions could maximize recovery following stroke. We examined whether the combination of peripherally initiated electrical stimulation of finger extensors and centrally operating finger tracking training could accentuate brain reorganization and its relationship to recovery, beyond the effects of either treatment alone. Twenty subjects with stroke were randomly assigned to an electrical stimulation (ES), tracking training (TR) or combination (CM) group. Each group was trained for ten 1-h sessions over 2–3 weeks. Pretest and posttest measurements consisted of the Box and Block and Jebsen Taylor tests of manual dexterity and a finger tracking test that was performed during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). fMRI variables included laterality index and BOLD signal intensity of primary motor (M1), primary sensory (S1), sensorimotor (SMC) and premotor (PMC) cortices as well as, supplementary motor area (SMA). ES and CM groups improved on dexterity, whereas the TR group did not. Improvement in the CM group was not greater than the other two groups. Subjects who had an intact M1 showed greater functional improvement than those who had direct involvement of M1. fMRI analysis did not yield significant changes from pretest to posttest. In the CM group only, functional improvement was positively correlated with laterality index change in M1, S1, SMC and PMC, indicating greater ipsilesional control and was negatively correlated with BOLD Signal Intensity change in ipsilesional S1 and SMA, indicating neurophysiological trimming of irrelevant neurons. The correlational results suggest that the combined intervention may be more influential on brain reorganization than either treatment alone but a larger sample size, longer duration of training, or a restricted inclusion of stroke location and volume may be needed to demonstrate a difference in efficacy for producing behavioral changes.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号