A meta-analysis of ambulatory versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
| |
Authors: | N Z Ahmad G Byrnes S A Naqvi |
| |
Institution: | (1) Midwestern Regional Hospital, Ennis, Co Clare, Republic of Ireland |
| |
Abstract: | Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is increasingly used on an ambulatory basis. This study aimed to examine its effectiveness for
carefully selected patients.
Methods A systematic review of Cochrane, Embase, and Medline using the keywords “ambulatory,” “laparoscopic,” and “cholecystectomy”
was performed. Postoperative complications leading to admissions and readmissions were compared between day care and inpatient
laparoscopic cholecystectomy groups. Postoperative quality of life, patient satisfaction, and cost effectiveness also were
analyzed.
Results The search process identified seven clinical trials suitable for meta-analysis. These trials, consisting of 598 patients,
compared day care and inpatient procedures. The unplanned admission rate in the ambulatory group was comparable with the prolonged
hospitalization of inpatients (odds ratio OR], 1.979; 95% confidence interval CI], 0.846–4.628). There was no significant
difference between the readmission rates of the two groups (OR, 0.964; 95% CI, 0.318–2.922). The quality-of-life indicators
were similar for the ambulatory and overnight-stay patients (p = 0.195). The cost effectiveness was better for the day care procedures because of the shorter mean hospital stay.
Conclusion Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed safely for selected patients, with reduced cost and a high level
of patient satisfaction. |
| |
Keywords: | Ambulatory Cholecystectomy Laparoscopic |
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|