首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Prevalence of co-morbidity in different European RRT populations and its effect on access to renal transplantation.
Authors:Vianda S Stel  Paul C W van Dijk  Jeannette G van Manen  Friedo W Dekker  David Ansell  Ferruccio Conte  Reinhard Kramar  Torbj?rn Leivestad  Emili Vela  J Douglas Briggs  Kitty J Jager
Institution:ERA-EDTA Registry, Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, J1b 113.1, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands. v.s.stel@amc.uva.nl
Abstract:BACKGROUND: This study compared the prevalence of co-morbidity in patients starting renal replacement therapy (RRT) between European countries and further examined how co-morbidity affects access to transplantation. METHODS: In this ERA-EDTA registry special study, 17907 patients from Austria, Catalonia (Spain), Lombardy (Italy), Norway, and the UK (England/Wales) were included (1994-2001). Co-morbidity was recorded at the start of RRT. RESULTS: The prevalence of co-morbidity was: diabetes mellitus (DM) (primary renal disease and co-morbidity) 28%, ischaemic heart disease (IHD) 23%, peripheral vascular disease (PVD) 24%, cerebrovascular disease (CVD) 14% and malignancy 11%. With exception of malignancy, the prevalence of co-morbidity was highest in Austria, but differences were small among other countries. With exception of DM, males suffered more often from co-morbidity than females. In general, the percentage of haemodialysis was higher in patients with co-morbidity, but treatment modality differed substantially between countries. Using a Cox regression with adjustment for demographics, country, year of start and other co-morbidities, the presence of each of the co-morbid conditions made it less likely RR; 95%CI] to receive a transplant within 4 years: DM 0.79; 0.70-0.88], IHD 0.59; 0.50-0.70], PVD 0.57; 0.49-0.67], CVD 0.49; 0.39-0.61], and malignancy 0.32; 0.24-0.42]. The age, gender and year of start adjusted relative risk 95%CI] to receive a renal transplant within 4 years ranged from 0.23 0.19-0.27] for Lombardy (Italy) to 3.86 3.36-4.45] for Norway (Austria = reference). These international differences existed for patients with and without co-morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of co-morbidity was highest in Austria but differences were small among other countries. The access to a renal graft was most affected by the presence of malignancy and least affected by the presence of DM. International differences in access to transplantation were only partly due to co-morbid variability.
Keywords:co-morbidity  dialysis  epidemiology  registries  renal replacement therapy  renal transplantation
本文献已被 Oxford 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号