Blood Cultures Positive for Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci: Antisepsis,Pseudobacteremia, and Therapy of Patients

A blood culture cohort study investigating issues related to isolation of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and other skin microflora is reported. Data were collected over 12 weeks to determine the incidence of significant CoNS bacteremia versus that of pseudobacteremia (contaminants) and to evaluate drug therapy in patients with cultures positive for CoNS. In addition, the effectiveness of 0.2% chlorine peroxide as a bactericidal disinfectant was compared to that of 10% providone iodine. A total of 3,276 cultures of blood from 1,433 patients were evaluated in the study. Eighty-nine cultures were positive for skin flora, with 81 of 89 (91%) involving CoNS. The incidence of significant CoNS bacteremia was 20 of 81 (24.7%), that of indeterminate bacteremia was 10 of 81 (12.3%), and that of contamination was 59 of 81 (72.8%). The incidence of significant bacteremia involving CoNS was double the 10 to 12% rate based on previous estimations at our institutions. In tests with the two bactericidal disinfectants, 22 of 1,639 cultures (1.3%) in the chlorine peroxide group versus 37 of 1,637 (2.3%) in the providone iodine group were considered contaminated (P = 0.065). Rates of contamination for venipuncture versus catheter collection were not significantly different (P = 0.46). The overall contamination rate was 59 of 3,276 (1.8%), which is consistent with the lower end of published quality assurance benchmark standards. The low rate was believed to be due to the professional phlebotomy staff in our institutions. There was excellent agreement between retrospective analysis by reviewers, when formal criteria were used, and the attending physicians’ intuitive clinical impressions in the classification of significant bloodstream infections (100% agreement) or contamination (95% agreement). However, physicians still used antimicrobial agents to treat nearly one-half of the patients with contaminated blood cultures, with vancomycin being misused in 34% of patients. In addition, 10% of patients with significant bacteremia were treated with inappropriate agents. There were no significant adverse events or prolonged hospital stays due to the unnecessary use of vancomycin; however, the additional costs of treating patients whose cultures contained CoNS contaminants was estimated to be $1,000 per patient. Measures to limit the unnecessary use of vancomycin (and other agents) are important.Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), the most frequent blood culture isolates, are predominantly blood culture contaminants, but they are also a significant cause of bacteremia (2–5, 7, 9, 13). Institution-specific contamination rates vary from 2 to more than 6% (3, 5, 23, 26, 27). In the past 5 years, estimated contamination rates at our hospitals ranged from 2.5 to 3.5%. During this period, CoNS accounted for 45 to 60% of total blood isolates, and we estimated, using laboratory criteria, that 10 to 12% of CoNS isolates from blood were implicated in significant bloodstream infections. A relatively large proportion of the patient population with presumed false-positive blood cultures due to contaminants (pseudobacteremia) were treated with antimicrobial agents, in particular, vancomycin.Clinical and microbiologic guidelines for the differentiation of true bacteremia from pseudobacteremia or contamination have been published (5, 13, 15). Suggested laboratory criteria for true bacteremia include growth within 48 h and multiple blood cultures positive for the same organism. In contrast, increased duration of time before positivity, polymicrobial growth of skin organisms, or growth during antibiotic treatment suggest contamination. Others recommended that the addition of clinical guidelines is essential for the appropriate classification of bacteremia (4, 8, 9, 15, 18).We conducted a cohort study to evaluate clinical and laboratory data for adult patients with blood cultures positive for CoNS. The study was done at two tertiary-care teaching centers, Deaconess Medical Center (DMC) and Sacred Heart Medical Center (SHMC), with a combined capacity of 900 beds. We examined problems associated with false-positive bacteremia and determined the incidence of significant bacteremia. Our goal was to make recommendations to improve clinicians’ ability to recognize the significance of potentially contaminating organisms and to evaluate treatment given to patients with CoNS-positive blood cultures. To attempt to minimize contamination, we evaluated the nontoxic, antiseptic and disinfectant chlorine peroxide in comparison to a standard disinfectant.(This work was previously presented in abstract form at the 96th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, New Orleans, La., 19 to 23 May 1996 [24a].)