首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

我军甲肝疫苗接种的成本-效果分析
引用本文:苏景宽,方沈应,张治英,徐德忠,李远贵. 我军甲肝疫苗接种的成本-效果分析[J]. 医学争鸣, 2001, 22(1): 57-60
作者姓名:苏景宽  方沈应  张治英  徐德忠  李远贵
作者单位:第四军医大学预防医学系流行病学教研室,
基金项目:全军“九五”指令性课题!(96 L0 49)
摘    要:目的 筛选出部队人群疫苗预防甲肝的最佳策略,为部队控制甲肝流行提供科学决策的依据。方法 运用成本-效果分析法和决策学方法。结果 从接种方案的成本-效果比(CER)来看,对部队干部人群实施先筛选再接种,其CER为-1231.27,直接接种CER为-269.84,新兵先筛选再接种,其CER为-762.56,直接接种CER为-32.10。经灵敏度分析发现,决策结果稳定,不随参数取值的变化而改变。结论 当前条件下,部队甲肝疫苗接种优选对象为干部人九,并首选先筛选再接种方案,由于新兵接种甲肝疫苗也产生正效益,所以对新兵也应考虑接种。

关 键 词:甲肝疫苗 接种 成本-效果分析 部队
文章编号:1000-2790(2001)01-0057-04
修稿时间:1999-12-12

Cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatitis A vaccination strategy among Chinese PLA
SU Jing-Kuan,FANG Shen-Ying,ZHANG Zhi-Ying,XU De-Zhong,LI Yuan-gui. Cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatitis A vaccination strategy among Chinese PLA[J]. Negative, 2001, 22(1): 57-60
Authors:SU Jing-Kuan  FANG Shen-Ying  ZHANG Zhi-Ying  XU De-Zhong  LI Yuan-gui
Abstract:AIM To screen the most cost effective strategy for vaccination against hepatitis A in the armies. METHODS Cost-effectiveness and decision tree analysis were adopted for decision making of vaccination strategies against HA in armies. RESULTS Cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) of ‘screen and vaccination’ (-1231.27) was lower than that of ‘direct vaccination’ (-269.84) for the officers. As far as the recruits were concerned, the former (-762.56) was lower than the latter (-32.10) too. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the result of decision did not change with the variation of the input data. CONCLUSION Officers should be considered first for vaccination and the screening-vaccination strategy is most cost-effective for them. The recruits should also be considered for the positive benefit of vaccination.
Keywords:military  hepatitis A  vaccination strategy  cost effectiveness analysi
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号