首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Validation study of a new method for sexual prediction based on CBCT analysis of maxillary sinus and mandibular canal
Affiliation:1. Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Limeira Avenue, 901, PO Box 52, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil;2. Division of Pharmacology, Anesthesiology and Therapeutic, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Department of Physiological Sciences, Limeira Avenue, 901, PO Box 52, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil;3. Division of Oral Radiology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Department of Surgery and Orthopedics, Porto Alegre, Ramiro Barcelos Avenue, 2492, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil;4. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), 4N-51 Gustav Mahlerlaan 3004, 1081 LA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;1. OMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;2. Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey;3. Division of Oral Radiology, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil;4. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China;5. Ankara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of DentoMaxillofacial Radiology, Ankara, Turkey;1. Oral Research Laboratory, Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain;2. Department of Special Needs, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Santiago de Compostela University, Santiago de Compostela, Spain;3. Research Laboratory, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Xeral-Cíes Hospital, Vigo, Spain;4. Etiology and Therapy of Periodontal Diseases (ETEP) Research Group, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain;1. Department of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil;2. Division of Forensic Dentistry, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto de Pesquisas São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, Brazil;3. Department of Therapeutic Dentistry, Institute of Dentistry, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia;4. Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia;5. Department of Stomatology, Public Health and Forensic Odontology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil;6. University of Dundee, Centre of Forensic and Legal Medicine and Dentistry, Dundee, United Kingdom;1. Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia;2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia;3. Faculty of Dentistry, International Medical University, Malaysia;1. Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, 901 – Areião, Piracicaba, SP 13414-903, Brazil;2. Department of Physiological Sciences, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, 901 – Areião, Piracicaba, SP 13414-903, Brazil
Abstract:ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of two craniometric methods for sexual prediction (SP) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the Dutch population and to construct a formula for each method and then the two combined.DesignOne-hundred sixty CBCT images were selected from a Dutch database (80 males and 80 females). The images were analyzed by two examiners taking seven measurements in the maxillary sinus (MS) region (first method) and nine in the mandibular canal (MC) region (second method). The most predictive measurements in both methods were used to develop an equation to determine the accuracy of each method.ResultsAll measurements showed statistical difference between genders. Logistic regression results showed two variables with greater SP index with 75% accuracy in the first method and four variables with 71.9% accuracy in the second. The two methods combined showed another four variables with 78.5% accuracy.ConclusionAll measurements showed statistically significant differences between sexes. The SP accuracy values were 75% for first 71.9% for the second method. When the two methods were combined, the accuracy increased to 78.5%. The formulas developed in this study can be applied as a complementary method for human identification in the Dutch population.
Keywords:Radiology  Maxillary sinus  Mandible  Cone-beam computed tomography
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号