Interprofessional training and team function in patient-centred medical home: Findings from a mixed method study of interdisciplinary provider perspectives |
| |
Authors: | Karleen F. Giannitrapani Lucinda Leung Alexis K. Huynh Susan E. Stockdale Danielle Rose Jack Needleman |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Menlo Park, CA, USAkarleen@stanford.edu;3. Division of General Internal Medicine &4. Health Services Research, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA;5. Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation &6. Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA;7. Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation &8. Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA |
| |
Abstract: | ABSTRACTTransitioning from profession-specific to interprofessional (IP) models of care requires major change. The Veterans Assessment and Improvement Laboratory (VAIL), is an initiative based in the United States that supports and evaluates the Veterans Health Administration’s (VAs) transition of its primary care practices to an IP team based patient-centred medical home (PCMH) care model. We postulated that modifiable primary care practice organizational climate factors impact PCMH implementation. VAIL administered a survey to 322 IP team members in primary care practices in one VA administrative region during early implementation of the PCMH and interviewed 79 representative team members. We used convergent mixed methods to study modifiable organizational climate factors in relationship to IP team functioning. We found that leadership support and job satisfaction were significantly positively associated with team functioning. We saw no association between team functioning and either role readiness or team training. Qualitative interview data confirmed survey findings and explained why the association with IP team training might be absent. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate the importance of leadership support and individual job satisfaction in producing highly functioning PCMH teams. Based on qualitative findings, we hypothesize interprofessional training is important, however, inconsistencies in IP training delivery compromise its potential benefit. Future implementation efforts should improve standardization of training process and train team members together. Interprofessional leadership coordination of interprofessional training is warranted. |
| |
Keywords: | Interdisciplinary teams mixed methods research Patient-Centered Medical Home team functioning team training |
|
|