Pediatric Agitation in the Emergency Department: A Survey of Pediatric Emergency Care Coordinators |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Emergency Medicine (AA Foster), University of California San Francisco, Calif;2. The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor UCLA (M Saidinejad and R Goodman), Torrance, Calif;3. David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA (M Saidinejad), Los Angeles, Calif;4. Department of Emergency Medicine (M Saidinejad), Harbor UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, Calif;5. Department of Emergency Medicine (S Duffy), The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI;6. Division of Emergency Medicine (JA Hoffmann), Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children...s Hospital of Chicago, Ill;7. Feinberg School of Medicine (JA Hoffmann), Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill;8. Division of Emergency Medicine (MC Monuteaux and J Li), Boston Children...s Hospital, Mass;9. Department of Emergency Medicine (J Li), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass;10. Department of Pediatrics (J Li), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass |
| |
Abstract: | ObjectiveAcute agitation episodes in the emergency department (ED) can be distressing for patients, families, and staff and may lead to injuries. We aim to understand availability of ED resources to care for children with acute agitation, perceived staff confidence with agitation management, barriers to use of de-escalation techniques, and desired resources to enhance care.MethodsWe conducted a survey of pediatric emergency care coordinators (PECCs) in EDs in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Los Angeles County, California.ResultsPECCs from 63 of 102 (61.8%) EDs responded. PECCs reported that ED staff feel least confident managing agitation due to developmental delay (DD) or autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (52.4%). Few EDs had a separate space to care for children with mental health conditions (22.5%), a standardized agitation scale (9.6%), an agitation management guideline (12.9%), or agitation management training (24.2%). Modification of the environment was not perceived possible for 42% of EDs. Participants reported that a barrier to the use of the de-escalation techniques distraction and verbal de-escalation was perceived lack of effectiveness (22.6% and 22.6%, respectively). Desired resources to manage agitation included guidelines for medications (82.5%) and sample care pathways (57.1%).ConclusionsED PECCs report low confidence in managing agitation due to DD or ASD and limited pediatric resources to address acute agitation. Additional pediatric-specific resources and training, especially for children with DD or ASD, are needed to increase clinician confidence in agitation management and to promote high-quality, patient-centered care. Training programs can focus on the early identification of agitation and the effective use of non-invasive de-escalation strategies. |
| |
Keywords: | agitation emergency department mental and behavioral health pediatric preparedness |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|