首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Evaluating patient-perceived control of atopic dermatitis: design,validation, and scoring of the Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT)
Authors:David M. Pariser  Eric L. Simpson  Abhijit Gadkari  Thomas Bieber  David J. Margolis  Michelle Brown
Affiliation:1. Department of Dermatology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA;2. Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA;3. Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, NY, USA;4. Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany;5. Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA;6. RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
Abstract:Abstract

Objectives: The Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) was designed to evaluate patient-perceived AD control and facilitate patient–physician discussion on long-term disease control.

Methods: The study was performed in adult patients with AD. Development of the ADCT followed US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Qualitative research, including targeted literature review, interviews with clinical experts, and combined concept elicitation/cognitive debriefing with patients with AD, was conducted to provide a list of comprehensive concepts capturing AD control per physician and patient perspectives. Quantitative methods assessed psychometric properties of the instrument and defined the threshold for AD control.

Results: The resulting pilot six-item ADCT, reflecting key concepts related to AD control, had 7-day recall and assessed symptoms and impacts on patients’ everyday lives by severity and/or frequency. The ADCT showed good content validity (well understood by adult patients with AD), and quick completion time (<2?min). Psychometric analysis indicated no floor/ceiling effects for response distributions, particularly strong (r?≥?0.80) inter-item correlations for the six ADCT items, robust construct validity (r?>?0.50), and item-level discriminating ability (p?0.80). A score ≥7 points was identified as an optimum threshold to identify patients whose AD is “not in control.”

Conclusions: No single validated instrument has been available to holistically evaluate patient-perceived AD control. The newly developed ADCT displays good-to-excellent content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, reliability, and discriminating ability.
Keywords:Atopic dermatitis  patient-reported outcomes  long-term disease control  psychometric validation
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号