首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Systematic review of clinical trials on acupuncture in the Japanese literature
Affiliation:1. Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan;2. Cellular Transplantation Biology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan;3. Division of Molecular Medicine, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan;4. Department of Hematology and Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan;5. Japanese Red Cross Kanto-Koshinetsu Block Blood Center, Tokyo, Japan;6. Division of Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan;7. Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan;8. Department of Promotion for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Aichi Medical University, Nagoya, Japan;9. Hematology Division, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan;10. Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya First Hospital, Nagoya, Japan;11. Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate and introduce the current status of acupuncture clinical trials in Japan.Methods: We performed a database search of controlled clinical trials (CCTs) published in Japan, using ‘Igaku Chuo Zasshi (Japana Centra Revuo Medicina) CD-ROM version (between 1987–2000)’ and an independent search. Parallel or crossover designed trials which assessed the efficacy of needle acupuncture were included.Results: We located 32 published papers (24 full papers and eight abstracts), which reported 34 trials. Only two of these were listed in Medline or the Cochrane Library. Conditions examined were musculoskeletal pain (20 trials including 10 for low back pain and three for sciatica), neck and shoulder stiffness (four trials) and miscellaneous conditions (10 trials). Thirty-three trials were described as randomized, although seven trials employed a quasi-random method. Applying the 5-point Jadad quality assessment scoring system, the mean score was 1.85 ± 1.16 (SD). Eighteen (53%) of the reports were conducted to determine a more effective procedure of acupuncture, these compared a certain type of acupuncture with another type of acupuncture or specific additional points.Conclusions: Japanese acupuncture CCTs, which are rarely listed in the Western databases, differ in several respects from Western reports. Systematic reviews including non-English papers with collaboration among authors representing different languages would promote more thorough scientific evaluation of complementary and alternative medicine.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号