首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

硬膜外阻滞麻醉用于无痛分娩临床效果观察
引用本文:李淑云,梁志芳,张华.硬膜外阻滞麻醉用于无痛分娩临床效果观察[J].国际医药卫生导报,2012,18(17):2581-2583.
作者姓名:李淑云  梁志芳  张华
作者单位:527200,罗定市妇幼保健院
摘    要:目的 探讨硬膜外阻滞麻醉用于无痛分娩的临床效果.方法 132例顺产产妇随机分为实验组和对照组.对照组按照常规顺产方式分娩,实验组采用硬膜外阻滞麻醉无痛分娩.结果 实验组VAS评分、第一产程和第二产程时间均显著少于对照组,差异有显著性(均P<0.01);产后出血量略少于对照组,但差异无显著性(P>0.05).两组均末发生严重副反应.结论 硬膜外阻滞麻醉用于无痛分娩,可显著缓解疼痛,缩短分娩时间,值得临床考虑.

关 键 词:硬膜外阻滞麻醉  无痛分娩  临床效果

The clinical efficacy of epidural anesthesia in painless labor
LI Shu-yun , LIANG Zhi-fang , ZHANG Hua.The clinical efficacy of epidural anesthesia in painless labor[J].International Medicine & Health Guidance News,2012,18(17):2581-2583.
Authors:LI Shu-yun  LIANG Zhi-fang  ZHANG Hua
Institution:LI Shu-yun, LIANG Zhi-fang, Zt-IANG Hua. Women and Child Health Hospital of Luoding, Luoding 527200, China
Abstract:ObJective To explore the clinical efficacy of epidural anesthesia in painless labor. Methods 132 puerperas who was in a delivery way of eutocia were randomly/divided into a study group and a control group. The control group gave birth in a routine delivery way, while the study group received epidural anesthesia for painless labor. Results The VAS scores were smaller and the first and second stages of labor were significantly shorter in the study group than in the control group ( P 〈 0.01 for all comparisons ); The amount of postpartum hemorrhage was less in the study group than in the control group, but with no significant difference ( P〉 0.05 ). No severe adverse reactions occurred in both groups. Conclusions Epidural anesthesia for painless labor can markedly relieve pain and shorten delivery, so it is desirable considerinq in clinical work.
Keywords:Epidural anesthesia  Painless labor  Clinical efficacy
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号