首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

两种非语言疼痛评估工具的应用现状分析
引用本文:殷琦,杨悦来,李燕,茅越丽.两种非语言疼痛评估工具的应用现状分析[J].国际护理学杂志,2016(16):2191-2193.
作者姓名:殷琦  杨悦来  李燕  茅越丽
作者单位:200011,上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院
基金项目:上海第九人民医院护理基金(JYHL20151712) Fund program:Nursing Fund of the Ninth People's Hospital of Shanghai (JYHL20151712)
摘    要:目的:通过对两种非语言疼痛评估工具相关研究进行文献分析,为我国非语言疼痛评估工具的选择提供参考。方法运用疼痛评估工具性能评分系统对计算机检索获取的相关文献进行分析。结果共纳入29篇文献,疼痛行为量表( BPS)与重症监护疼痛观察工具( CPOT)平均得分分别为9.20分、9.32分。结论疼痛行为量表( BPS)与重症监护疼痛观察工具( CPOT)逐渐被广泛应用于非语言疼痛患者的疼痛评估,但在不同人群中两者的信效度都存在差异,仍需进一步被验证。

关 键 词:非语言  疼痛  评估  信度  效度

Analysis of the status quo of the application of two kinds of non-verbal pain assess-ment tools
Abstract:Objective To analyze the relevant researches and literatures in terms of the two kinds of non-ver-bal pain assessment tools to provide references for the selection and study of non-verbal pain assessment tools of Chi-na. Methods The performance scoring system of pain assessment tools was used to analyze the relevant literatures searched on Internet. Results A total of 29 papers were included in this study. The average scores of the Behavioral Pain Scale ( BPS ) and the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool ( CPOT ) were 9. 20 and 9. 32 respectively. Conclusions The Behavioral Pain Scale ( BPS) and the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool ( CPOT) are gradually and widely used in the pain assessment for non-verbal pain patients. However, the reliability and validity of the two pain as-sessment tools are different for various groups, it is essential to test their reliability and validity further.
Keywords:Nonverbal  Pain  Assessment  Reliability  Validity
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号