Classical and endovascular surgery: Indications and outcomes |
| |
Authors: | Edward B. Diethrich |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Arizona Heart Institute and Foundation, 2632 N. 20th Street, 85006 Phoenix, AZ |
| |
Abstract: | For more than 40 years, endarterectomy and bypass grafting have been the primary means of surgically revascularizing peripheral vessels threatened by atherosclerotic disease. However, with today's endovascular technology, stenoses and occlusions in nearly every circulatory system can be approached intraluminally with a wide variety of techniques: thrombolysis, laser angioplasty, atherectomy, balloon dilation, and intravascular stents. Just as exciting is the newer technique of endoluminal grafting, which has extended percutaneous therapy to aneurysmal disease in the thoracic and abdominal aorta and distal arteries, as well as to long-segment occlusive disease. Today's vascular surgeon is in a unique position to combine his or her classical surgical training with these catheter-based interventions. Certainly, the potential advantages of percutaneous therapy as compared to surgical reconstruction are significant: no general anesthesia or lengthy incisions, shorter hospitalization, lower morbidity and mortality, earlier intervention in the course of the disease, and less complicated reapplication in the event of disease recurrence. Undoubtedly, endovascular techniques will become a major component of the vascular surgeon's armamentarium, and as we approach the year 2000, they will be the treatment of choice in nearly every vascular pathology and circulatory system.Presented at the XCIV Annual Congress of the Japan Surgical Society, Tokyo, March 29–31, 1994. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|