Combination of stromal cell‐derived factor‐1 and collagen–glycosaminoglycan scaffold delays contraction and accelerates reepithelialization of dermal wounds in wild‐type mice |
| |
Authors: | Aparajita Sarkar MS Soner Tatlidede MD Saja Sandra Scherer MD Dennis P. Orgill MD PhD François Berthiaume PhD |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Center for Engineering in Medicine/Surgical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts,;2. Shriners Hospitals for Children, Boston, Massachusetts,;3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts,;4. Division of Plastic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts,;5. Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, and;6. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey |
| |
Abstract: | While dermal substitutes can mitigate scarring and wound contraction, a significant drawback of current dermal replacement technologies is the apparent delay in vascular ingrowth compared with conventional skin grafts. Herein, we examined the effect of the chemokine stromal cell‐derived factor‐1 (SDF‐1) on the performance of a porous collagen–glycosaminoglycan dermal analog in excisional wounds in mice. C57BL/6 mice with 1 cm × 1 cm dorsal full‐thickness wounds were covered with a collagen–glycosaminoglycan scaffold, followed by four daily topical applications of 1 μg SDF‐1 or phosphate‐buffered saline vehicle. Some animals were also pretreated with five daily doses of 300 mg/kg granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor. Animals treated with SDF‐1 and no granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor reepithelialized 36% faster than vehicle controls (16 vs. 25 days), and exhibited less wound contraction on postwounding day 18 (~35% greater wound area) plus three‐fold longer neoepidermis formed than controls. Conversely, granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor promoted contraction and no epidermal regeneration. Early (postwounding Day 3) inflammatory cell infiltration in the SDF‐1‐treated group was 86% less, while the fraction of proliferating cells (positive Ki67 staining) was 32% more, when compared with controls. These results suggest that SDF‐1 simultaneously delays contraction and promotes reepithelialization and may improve the wound‐healing performance of skin substitutes. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|