首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Antifungal activity of lawsone methyl ether in comparison with chlorhexidine
Authors:Nattapon Sritrairat  Narin Nukul  Piyanut Inthasame  Attapon Sansuk  Jinda Prasirt  Thassin Leewatthanakorn  Uayporn Piamsawad  Aree Dejrudee  Pharkphoom Panichayupakaranant  Kanokporn Pangsomboon  Nilnara Chanowanna  Janpim Hintao  Rawee Teanpaisan  Wisut Chaethong  Pataraporn Yongstar  Nannapat Pruphetkaew  Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong  Wipawee Nittayananta
Affiliation:1. Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand;2. Department of Pharmacognosy and Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand;3. Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand;4. Dental Division, Songkhla Rajanagarindra Psychiatric Hospital, Songkhla, Thailand;5. Department of Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand;6. Rural Oral Health Centre of Southern Thailand, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand;7. Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand
Abstract:J Oral Pathol Med (2011) 40 : 90–96 Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the antifungal activity of lawsone methyl ether mouthwash (LME) in comparison with chlorhexidine mouthwash (CHX) in vitro and in vivo. Materials and methods: For in vitro study, each mouthwash preparation was added into the inoculum of Candida. The turbidity was recorded after incubation at 37°C for 48 h. Candidal culture was performed and the number of colony of Candida albicans was recorded. For in vivo study, a crossover clinical trial was conducted in 22 HIV‐infected subjects and 32 denture wearers. Clinical examination was performed and oral rinse technique was carried out immediately before and 0, 1, 2 h after using each mouthwash. Allergy and subjective assessment of the mouthwashes were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using one‐way ANOVA and linear mixed effect modeling. Results: In vitro, antifungal activity of 0.25% LME was significantly greater than that of 0.12% CHX (P < 0.05) and comparable with that of 0.2% CHX. In vivo, antifungal activity up to 2 hours of 0.025% LME mouthwash was evidenced in both groups of subjects, although significantly lower than that of 0.12% CHX. No allergic reaction was reported. LME mouthwash was graded to have less bitter taste than that of CHX. Subjects’ satisfaction on taste and smell of LME mouthwash was significantly greater than that of CHX (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Lawsone methyl ether mouthwash possesses potent antifungal activity both in vitro and in vivo. However, concentration of the mouthwash needs to be adjusted in addition to further clinical trials on long‐term use.
Keywords:antifungal activity  Candida  chlorhexidine  HIV  lawsone methyl ether  mouthwash
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号