Comparison of PCR with the routine procedure for diagnosis of tuberculosis in a population with high prevalences of tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus

Direct smear examination with Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) as employed in most low-income countries is cheap and easy to use, but its low sensitivity is a major drawback. The low specificity of chest X-rays, used for the diagnosis of smear-negative TB, risks high levels of overdiagnosis. Major advances in molecular techniques, which rapidly identify mycobacterial DNA in sputa, may overcome these obstacles. In this study, the AMPLICOR PCR system was used to diagnose pulmonary TB in a developing country with high prevalences of both TB and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The sensitivity and specificity of this technique were compared to those of the usual diagnostic techniques. Sputum specimens were collected from 1,396 TB suspects attending the Rhodes Chest Clinic, Nairobi, Kenya. The specimens were analyzed for the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by PCR; culture on Löwenstein-Jensen medium was used as the “gold standard.” All culture-positive samples were genotyped to identify the mycobacterial species. The sensitivity and specificity of PCR were 93 and 84%, respectively. HIV status did not affect the sensitivity of PCR. A total of 99.7% of the true smear-positive and 82.1% of the true smear-negative TB patients were correctly identified by PCR. PCR detected M. tuberculosis in 11.7% of the culture-negative suspects, 60% of which had one or two PCR-positive sputum specimens. Of the 490 positive cultures, 486 were identified as M. tuberculosis. The high sensitivity of Amplicor PCR merits usage in a clinical setting with high TB and HIV burdens. Thus, PCR can be considered as an alternative to ZN staining in combination with chest X-ray for diagnosis of TB; however, cost-effectiveness studies and operational studies are required to support an evidence-based decision of introducing PCR for TB control in high-burden environments.Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the most serious infectious diseases and a considerable public health problem due to its high risk of person-to-person transmission, morbidity, and mortality. Both the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic and social deterioration have contributed to the overall increase in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection rate, especially in developing countries, where resources are scarce (13). In Nairobi the case detection rate increased from 78 per 100,000 in 1991 to 581 per 100,000 in 2001, with a total number of 12,963 cases.Early diagnosis followed by adequate treatment is essential to prevent both morbidity and mortality. Although the conventional technique of direct smear examination with Ziehl-Neelsen staining (ZN) is cheap and easy to perform, its low sensitivity is a major drawback. Depending on the number of specimens examined, ZN detects 30 to 60% of the culture-positive “TB suspects” (7). Furthermore, it requires sputum samples collected on consecutive days, making the procedure slow and making patient compliance with the diagnostic process difficult.New techniques are very much needed (7), and molecular amplification assays such as PCR have been shown to be promising alternatives even for developing countries (2). PCR has the potential to be a cost-effective alternative, provided the diagnosis can be determined with one sputum examination (8). If diagnosis can be established faster, and the diagnostic process becomes less cumbersome for the patient, PCR may reduce delay both in diagnosis and in the start of treatment.Depending on the “gold standard” and other methodological factors, studies show PCR sensitivities ranging from 77% to more than 95% and PCR specificities of >95% for smear-positive specimens (4, 9, 10, 12). However, sensitivities for smear-negative TB patients have been reported to be below 90% (9). Most PCR studies have been performed in industrial countries (4, 9, 10, 12) where the TB and HIV burdens are low.To investigate the performance and feasibility of PCR in an environment of TB endemicity and high prevalences of HIV and AIDS, a study was conducted in Nairobi, Kenya, comparing PCR to conventional routine diagnostic methods within a program setup. In this study, the Roche Amplicor Mycobacteria PCR test for the direct detection of M. tuberculosis was used on sputum specimens from TB suspects attending a chest clinic in Nairobi. Its performance was compared with those of the basic routine diagnostic procedures according to the national guidelines (6), including clinical findings, ZN, and chest X-rays (CXR), on smear-negative suspects. Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) culture results were used as the gold standard.