首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

提高下中切牙双根管检出率的方法学研究
作者姓名:Wang XL  Xu Y  Sun Q  Zhang Z
作者单位:上海交通大学附属第一人民医院口腔科
摘    要:目的:用5种不同方法对离体下颌中切牙的单、双根管发生率及根管形态走向进行分析,比较其在下颌中切牙双根管检出率方面的差异,为临床治疗提供依据。方法:收集新鲜拔除的下颌中切牙176颗,分别采用X线唇舌向摄片、肉眼下15#K型锉探查、根管显微镜下15#K型锉探查、螺旋CT扫描、离体牙横截面法进行观察。采用SAS6.12软件包对所得数据进行统计学分析,采用McNemar确切概率法对5种方法双根管检出率进行两两比较。结果:以离体牙横截面观察结果为金标准,176颗下颌中切牙的双根管率为9.66%,双根管均为唇舌向分根,其中Ⅱ型根管占4.55%,Ⅴ型根管占5.11%。其他方法双根管检出率分别为X线唇舌向摄片法0.00%、肉眼下15#K型锉探查法2.84%、根管显微镜下15#K型锉探查法4.76%、螺旋CT扫描法9.09%。对5种不同方法的观察结果进行列联系数γ的统计学分析显示,在下颌中切牙双根管的检出率方面,离体牙横截面观察法>螺旋CT扫描法>根管显微镜下15#K型锉探查法>肉眼下15#K型锉探查法>X线唇舌向摄片法。结论:下颌中切牙存在一定比例的双根管发生率,临床医师应高度重视舌侧根管的存在,避免遗漏。当临床上常用的X线唇舌向摄片法和肉眼法不能发现可疑双根管时,建议改用X线偏移投照牙片法或使用根管显微镜及螺旋CT扫描等辅助检查方法。

关 键 词:离体牙横截面  螺旋CT扫描  根管显微镜  X线唇舌向摄片  下颌中切牙  双根管

The methodological study of improving the detected rate of mandibular central incisor with two canals
Wang XL,Xu Y,Sun Q,Zhang Z.The methodological study of improving the detected rate of mandibular central incisor with two canals[J].Shanghai Journal of Stomatology,2012,21(2):157-162.
Authors:Wang Xiao-li  Xu Yi  Sun Qing  Zhang Zun
Institution:Department of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Shanghai, China. XSJ@citiz.net
Abstract:PURPOSE: To investigate the detected rate and modality of multiple canals in mandibular central incisor by 5 different methods and to compare the results and differences among the methods,in order to provide give theoretical evidence of choosing right method and treatment in clinic.METHODS: 176 mandibular central incisors were examined by 5 different methods,including radiograph at a horizontal angle of 0,macrography 15#K-file,dental operative microscope,spiral CT scanning,and dental cross section.All statistical analysis was performed using SAS6.12 software package.Data of detected rate of these 5 methods were compared using McNemar exact probability test.RESULTS: The result of dental cross section was the key standard,the rate in 176 mandibular central incisor was 9.66% with two canals,of which 4.55% were type Ⅱ,5.11% were type Ⅴ.The detected rate of two-canal teeth was 0.00% by radiograph at a horizontal angle of 0,2.84% by macroscopy15# K-file,4.76% by dental operative microscope,and 9.09% by spiral CT scanning,respectively.The results from 5 methods were compared with each other by McNemar test to find out the difference.Validity of these 5 methods according to γ was dental cross section > spiral CT scanning > dental operative microscope > macroscopy 15#K-file > radiograph at a horizontal angle of 0.CONCLUSIONS: Some mandibular central incisors have two canals,the clinicians should pay more attention to avoid missing canals.When radiograph at a horizontal angle of 0 and macroscopy 15#K-file can’t effectively find two canals,we suggest using the other methods such as radiograph with an excursion angle,dental operative microscope and spiral CT scanning to make clear diagnosis.
Keywords:Dental cross section  Spiral CT scanning  Dental operative microscope  Radiograph with a horizontal angle of 0  Mandibular central incisor  Two canals
本文献已被 CNKI PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号