寄生虫病国际合作与学术影响力的相关关系——以中国疾病预防控制中心寄生虫病预防控制所为例

目的 目的 调查2002-2012年中国疾病预防控制中心寄生虫病预防控制所科研和外事活动进展， 在个体水平上评估国际合作与学术影响力的关系。方法 方法 以科研人员数量与结构、 科研项目与经费、 出访频次等非文献计量学指标评价中国疾病预防控制中心寄生虫病预防控制所科研及外事活动进展情况， 以发文量、 h指数等文献计量学指标评价高级科研人员的学术影响力， 采用协方差分析和广义线性模型探讨寄生虫病防治研究机构国际合作与学术影响力的关系。结果 结果 自2002年建所以来， 中国疾病预防控制中心寄生虫病预防控制所科研项目及经费、 出访频次等均呈增长态势， 2011年后增长尤为显著。机构h2指数为7。协方差分析和广义线性模型分析显示， 国际伙伴数 （F = 81.75， P < 0.000 1）、 国际合作项目数（F = 22.81， P < 0.000 1）、 国内项目数 （F = 7.30， P = 0.011 0） 和学位 （F = 3.80， P = 0.033 0） 等4个因素对个体学术影响力的贡献较大， 而出国频次、 职称、 工龄等因素与h指数无显著相关性 （P > 0.05）。结论 结论 加大国际合作项目申请力度和发展长期稳固的国际伙伴关系可提高机构和个人在寄生虫病领域的国际学术影响力。

Assessing the correlation between international collaboration and academic influence in parasitic diseases: a case study of National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention

Objective To investigate the activity of scientific research and international collaboration in National Institute ofParasitic Diseases（NIPD），Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention（China CDC）from 2002 to 2012，and assess therelationship between international collaboration and academic influence at an individual level. Methods Non?bibliometric indica?tors including number and structure of scientific research personnel，number of projects and funds，visiting frequency，etc，wereused to assess the activity of scientific research and international collaboration，and bibliometric indicators including publicationsand h index，were employed to estimate the academic influence of senior professionals in NIPD，China CDC. The relationship be?tween the international collaboration and international academic influence in the control and research of parasitic diseases was eval?uated by using analysis of covariance and generalized linear models. Results There was an increase tendency of the number ofprojects，funds and visiting frequency in NIPD，China CDC since the foundation of the institute in 2002，notably after 2011. Theh2 index of NIPD，China was 7. Analysis of covariance and generalized linear model analysis revealed that the number of interna?tional partners（F = 81.75，P < 0.000 1），number of international projects（F =22.81，P < 0.000 1），number of national projects（F = 7.30，P = 0.011 0），and academic degree（F = 3.80，P = 0.033 0）contributed greatly to individual academic influence，while visiting frequency，professional title and length of service had no significant association with h index. Conclusion Eleva?tion of international collaboration projects and development of long?term，stable international partnership may enhance the institu?tional and individual international academic influence in the field of parasitic diseases.