经瞳孔温热疗法和光动力疗法治疗渗出型老年性黄斑变性短期疗效比较

目的 比较经瞳孔温热疗法(TTT) 和光动力疗法(PDT)治疗渗出型 老年性黄斑变性(AMD)脉络膜新生血管(CNV)的疗效。 方法 对比分析渗出性AMD患者行PDT 治疗的35例42只眼、TTT治疗的35例40只眼治疗前和治疗后3个月的临床资料。所有患者治疗前后均进行视力 、荧光素眼底血管造影（FFA）、吲哚青绿血管造影（ICGA）和光相干断层扫描（OCT）检查 。CNV类型均为黄斑中心凹下型或旁中心凹型。其中，隐匿性或隐匿性为主型的CNV44只眼 ，典型性及典型性为主型的CNV38只眼。PDT治疗的42只眼中，隐匿性或隐匿性为主型CNV19只眼，典型性或典型性为主型CNV23眼；TTT治疗的40只眼中，隐匿性或隐匿性为主型CNV25只眼，典型性及典型性为主型CNV15只眼。 结果 典型性或典型性为主型CNV治疗后1、3个月时，PDT组分别有47.8%、43.5%的患眼视力提高2行以上；TTT组分别有6.7%、6.7%的患眼视力提高2行以上。两组之间治疗后1、3个月时视力提高的比例比较，差异均有显著性的意义（χ2=7.118,P=0.0076；χ2=5.500,P=0.0190）。PDT组分别有100%、69.6%的患眼CNV荧光素渗漏停止或改善；TTT组分别有53.2%、80.0%的患眼CNV荧光素渗漏停止或改善。两组之间治疗后1个月时CNV荧光素渗漏停止或改善的比例比较，差异有显著性的意义（χ2=13.16,P=0.0003）；3个月时CNV荧光素渗漏停止或改善的比例比较，差异无显著性的意义（χ2=0.5098,P=0.4752）。隐匿性或隐匿性为主型CNV治疗后1、3个月时，PDT组分别有15.8% 、10.5%的患眼视力提高2行以上；TTT组分别有4.0%、8.0%的患眼视力提高2行以上。两组之间治疗后1、3个月时视力提高的比例比较，差异均无显著性的意义（χ2=1.816,P=0.17 78；χ2=0.0838,P=0.7728）。PDT组分别有78。9%、42.1% 的患眼CNV荧光素渗漏停止或改善；TTT组分别有52.0%、84.0%的患眼CNV荧光素渗漏停止或改善。两组之间治疗后1个月时CNV荧光素渗漏停止或改善的比例比较，差异无显著性的意义（2=3.388,P=0.0657）；3个月时CNV荧光素渗漏停止或改善的比例比较，差异具有显著性的意义（χ2=8.433,P=0.0037）。 结论 典型性及典型性为主型CNV治疗后3个月视力结果PDT优于TTT；治疗后1个月时FFA检查渗漏改善PDT明显优于TTT，但随诊至3个月时，二者疗效差异无显著性的意义。隐匿性或隐匿性为主型CNV治疗后3个月视力结果PDT与TTT差异无显著性的意义；治疗后1个月FFA检查渗漏改善改善PDT与TTT差异无显著性的意义，但随诊至3个月时，CNV渗漏消失和减少方面TTT疗效明显好于PDT。尚需要更多的病例及更长的随诊时间来评价两种治疗方法的疗效.（中华眼底病杂志，2004，20：285-288）

Short-term comparison of tanspupillary thermotherapy and photodynamic therapy for choroidal neovascularization in exudative age-related macular degeneration

Objective To compare the clinical results of photodynamic therapy(PDT) and transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT) for patients with choroidal neovascularization caused by exudative age-related macular degeneration. Methods Seventy cases (82 eyes) with exudative AMD were divided into PDT and TTT groups. Thirty-five cases (42 eyes) were treated with PDT. Nineteen eyes had occult or predominantly occult CNV. Twenty-three eyes had classic or predominantly classic CNV. Thirty-five cases (40 eyes) were treated with TTT. Twenty-five eyes had occult or predominantly occult CNV. Fifteen eyes had classic or predominantly classic CNV. Visual acuity, FFA, ICGA and OCT were evaluated before and after treatment. All cases were subfoveal or juxtafoveal CNV. The follow-up was (3-6 months.) Results Visual acuity in 3 eyes (15.8%) of PDT group and 1 eye (4.0%) in TTT group increased at least 2 lines. The difference was no significant(P=0.1778), FFA showed cessation or reduction of fluorescein leakage from CNV in 15 eyes(78.9%) in PDT group and 13 eyes(52.0%) in TTT group. The difference was not significant (P=0.0657). Three months after treatment, The visual acuity of 2 eyes(10.5%) in PDT group and 2 eyes (8.0%) in TTT group increased at least 2 lines. The difference was not significant (P=0.7728). FFA showed cessation or reduction of fluorescein leakage from CNV in 8 eyes(42.1%) in PDT group and 21 eyes(84.0%) in TTT group. The difference was significant (P=0.0037). Conclusion For classic CNV, the short-term effect of PDT is better than TTT concerning visual acuity. The effect of PDT is apparently better than TTT in cessation or reduction of fluorescein leakage one month after treatment. But there was no significant difference between PDT and TTT in cessation or reduction of fluorescein leakage three month after treatment. For occult CNV, there is no significant short-term difference between PDT and TTT concerning visual acuity. There was no significant difference between PDT and TTT in cessatin or reduction of fluorescein leakage one month after treatment. But three month after treatment TTT is apparently better than PDT in cessation or reduction of fluorescein leakage. We need more cases and longer follow -up to evaluate these two kinds of treatments in treating exudative age-related macular degeneration.