首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

A Molecular Adsorbent Recycling System in Treating Posthepatectomy Acute Hepatic Failure Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Bridge to Liver Transplantation
引用本文:Yu Wang Yihe Liu Weiping Zheng Yu Ming Zhongyang Shen Orient Organ Transplant Center,Tianjin First Central Hospital,Tianjin 300192,China.. A Molecular Adsorbent Recycling System in Treating Posthepatectomy Acute Hepatic Failure Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Bridge to Liver Transplantation[J]. 中国肿瘤临床(英文版), 2006, 3(4): 273-276. DOI: 10.1007/s11805-006-0055-7
作者姓名:Yu Wang Yihe Liu Weiping Zheng Yu Ming Zhongyang Shen Orient Organ Transplant Center  Tianjin First Central Hospital  Tianjin 300192  China.
作者单位:Yu Wang Yihe Liu Weiping Zheng Yu Ming Zhongyang Shen Orient Organ Transplant Center,Tianjin First Central Hospital,Tianjin 300192,China.
摘    要:OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect and safety of a Molecular Adsorbent Recycling System (MARS) in treating posthepatoectomy hepatic failure (AHF) patients surgically treated for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS 12 AHF patients induced by resection of HCC were treated with MARS before orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Their vital signs, urine volume, APACHEⅢand Glasgow scores were monitored. Routine laboratory blood tests, measurements of coagulatory function, liver and kidney function, serum ammonia, lactic acid and blood gas were conducted before and after treatment with MARS. All of the patients were followed up for a period of 6 months after OLT for prognosis and complication assessment. RESULTS Each patient was treated with MARS for 2-5 times (average of 3.6) with a length of 8-24 h each time. Their mean arterial blood pressure and urine volume were improved, APACHEⅢand Glasgow scores were better. Liver function was improved with the following alterations before and after treatment with MARS: serum ammonia (127.1±21.4 umol/L vs. 77.4±19.7 umol/L, P<0.05), lactic acid (6.53±0.45 mmol/L vs. 3.75±0.40 mmol/L, P<0.05) and total bilirubin (452.3±153.7 umol/L vs. 230.9±115.2 umol/L, P<0.05). However, there was no significant change in platelet count (44.25±3.60×109/L vs. 43.19±8.26×109/L, P>0.05) on international normalized ratio (INR) (2.74±0.50 us. 2.82±0.60, P>0.05), which showed the safety of MARS. For all patients no serious adverse effects occurred during the treatment with MARS. CONCLUSION MARS is effective and safe for treatment of AHF patients with HCC, especially as a bridge to OLT when a donor organ is not available.

关 键 词:分子吸附剂 循环系统 急性肝功能障碍 治疗
收稿时间:2006-07-11
修稿时间:2006-08-04

A molecular adsorbent recycling system in treating posthepatectomy acute hepatic failure patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a bridge to liver transplantation
Yu Wang,Yihe Liu,Weiping Zheng,Yu Ming,Zhongyang Shen. A molecular adsorbent recycling system in treating posthepatectomy acute hepatic failure patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a bridge to liver transplantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006, 3(4): 273-276. DOI: 10.1007/s11805-006-0055-7
Authors:Yu Wang  Yihe Liu  Weiping Zheng  Yu Ming  Zhongyang Shen
Affiliation:Orient Organ Transplant Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin 300192, China
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect and safety of a Molecular Adsorbent Recycling System (MARS) in treating posthepatoectomy hepatic failure (AHF) patients surgically treated for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS 12 AHF patients induced by resection of HCC were treated with MARS before orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Their vital signs, urine volume, APACHEIII and Glasgow scores were monitored. Routine laboratory blood tests, measurements of coagulatory function, liver and kidney function, serum ammonia, lactic acid and blood gas were conducted before and after treatment with MARS. All of the patients were followed up for a period of 6 months after OLT for prognosis and complication assessment. RESULTS Each patient was treated with MARS for 2–5 times (average of 3.6) with a length of 8–24 h each time. Their mean arterial blood pressure and urine volume were improved, APACHE III and Glasgow scores were better. Liver function was improved with the following alterations before and after treatment with MARS: serum ammonia (127.1±21.4 umol/L vs. 77.4±19.7 umol/L, P<0.05), lactic acid (6.53±0.45 mmol/L vs. 3.75±0.40 mmol/L, P<0.05) and total bilirubin (452.3±153.7 umol/L vs. 230.9±115.2 umol/L, P<0.05). However, there was no significant change in platelet count (44.25±3.60×109/L vs. 43.19±8.26×109/L, P>0.05) on international normalized ratio (INR) (2.74±0.50 vs. 2.82±0.60, P>0.05), which showed the safety of MARS. For all patients no serious adverse effects occurred during the treatment with MARS. CONCLUSION MARS is effective and safe for treatment of AHF patients with HCC, especially as a bridge to OLT when a donor organ is not available.
Keywords:MARS   hepotocellular carcinoma   posthepatectomy. acute hepatic failure   orthotopic liver transplantation
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号