Fully Integrated Laser Guidance for CT-Based Punctures: A Study in Phantoms and Patients

PurposeTo test the hypothesis of equal or even superior applicability and accuracy of a fully integrated, laser-based computed tomography (CT) navigation system compared with conventional CT guidance for percutaneous interventions.Materials and MethodsCT-guided punctures were first performed in phantoms. Four radiologists with different experience levels (2 residents (L.B., C.D.) and 2 board-certified radiologists (B.M., K.R.) performed 48 punctures using both conventional image-guided and laser-guided approaches. Subsequently, 12 punctures were performed in patients during a clinical pilot trial. Phantom targets required an in-plane or a single-/double-angulated, out-of-plane approach. Planning and intervention time, control scan number, radiation exposure, and accuracy of needle placement (measured by deviation of the needle tip to the designated target) were assessed for each guidance technique and compared (Mann-Whitney U test and t test). Patient interventions were additionally analyzed for applicability in a clinical setting.ResultsThe application of laser guidance software in the phantom study and in 12 human patients in a clinical setting was both technically and clinically feasible in all cases. The mean planning time (P = .009), intervention time (P = .005), control scan number (P < .001), and radiation exposure (P = .013) significantly decreased for laser-navigated punctures compared with those for conventional CT guidance and especially in punctures with out-of-plane-trajectories. The accuracy significantly increased for laser-guided interventions compared with that for conventional CT (P < .001).ConclusionsInterventional radiologists with differing levels of experience performed faster and more accurate punctures for out-of-plane trajectories in the phantom models, using a new, fully integrated, laser-guided CT software and demonstrated excellent clinical and technical success in initial clinical experiments.