| 工作能力指数表中文版的信度和效度 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 马来记,周彤,金泰( ),沈光祖,金锡鹏,张其正,王烨青,曹少华. 工作能力指数表中文版的信度和效度[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2000, 17(2): 70-72 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 马来记 周彤 金泰( ) 沈光祖 金锡鹏 张其正 王烨青 曹少华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]上海医科大学劳动卫生学教研室 [2]上海市黄浦区卫生防疫站 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的 检验工作能力指数表中文版的信度和效度。（方法）对５２１３名不同职业人群进行ＷＡＩ调查，并对其中３６名职业人员进行了重复调查、分半信度的方法进行信度检验；ＷＡＩ调查表中各条目间的一致性检验及职业人群不同背景资料与ＷＡＪ的关系进行效度检验。（结果）信度检验表明，重复调查的ＷＡＩ得分组内相关系数为０．８４；分半信度具有显著的统计学意义（Ｐ〈０．０１）。效度检验表明，各条目间的一致性较好。（结论）Ｗ
|
| 关 键 词： | 工作能力指数 信度 效度 中文版 |
Reliability and Validity of Work Ability Index in Chinese Version |
| |
| MA La-ji,ZHOU Tong,JIN Tai-yi,SHEN Guang-zhu,JI Xi-peng,ZHANG Qi-zheng,WANG Ye-qing,CAO Shao-hua. Reliability and Validity of Work Ability Index in Chinese Version[J]. Journal of Environmental & Occupational Medicine, 2000, 17(2): 70-72 |
| |
| Authors: | MA La-ji ZHOU Tong JIN Tai-yi SHEN Guang-zhu JI Xi-peng ZHANG Qi-zheng WANG Ye-qing CAO Shao-hua |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective] This study is to test reliability and validity of work ability index(WAI) in Chinese version.[Methods] A total of 5228 with different professional workers was investigated with questionnaire of WAI in Chinese version.36 among them were investigated repeatedly in an interval of two months.Reliability and validity of WAI were determined with test retest reliability and coherence among items or total in WAI. [Results] Internal class correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0 84 in test retest reliability.Pearson coefficient was 0.503 in half test reliability.Evidence for validity was significant by coherence among items or total.[Conclusion] Good reliability and validity of WAI in Chinese version were demonstrated. |
| |
| Keywords: | WAI reliability validity |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
