Bond strength of three chairside crown reline materials to milled polymethyl methacrylate resin |
| |
| Authors: | Varisha Parikh Dong-Hui Cheng Chase Linsley Kumar C. Shah |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Resident, Graduate Prosthodontics, Division of Advanced Prosthodontics, University of California Los Angeles School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, Calif;2. Research Associate, Division of Advanced Prosthodontics, University of California Los Angeles School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, Calif;3. Assistant Adjunct Professor, Bioengineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif;4. Professor of Clinical Dentistry, Division of Advanced Prosthodontics and Director, Advanced Prosthodontics Residency Program, University of California Los Angeles School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, Calif |
| |
| Abstract: | Statement of problemInformation on the bond strength of milled polymethyl methacrylate interim restorations when relined with chairside reline materials is lacking.PurposeThe purpose of this in vitro study was to measure the shear bond strength of various combinations of 3 different chairside reline materials bonded to milled polymethyl methacrylate blocks with 3 different types of surface treatments.Materials and methodsUniform blocks (10×10×22 mm) were milled from tooth-colored polymethyl methacrylate disks (Vivid PMMA; Pearson Dental Supply Co). The surface treatments tested were airborne-particle abrasion with 50-μm particle size aluminosilicate, application of acrylic resin monomer (Jet Liquid; Lang Dental Manufacturing Co) for 180 seconds, and airborne-particle abrasion with monomer application. The control groups were blocks with no surface treatment. The chairside reline materials tested were Jet acrylic resin (Jet Powder; Lang Dental Manufacturing Co), bis-acryl resin (Integrity; Dentsply Sirona), and flowable composite resin (Reveal; Bisco). All materials were applied through a Ø1.5×3-mm bonding ring. Ten specimens for each of the 12 groups were tested in a universal testing machine. Load was applied at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Fracture surfaces were then analyzed for cohesive versus adhesive or mixed failure. Data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer post hoc analysis (α=.05).ResultsThe mean shear bond strength values ranged from 1.77 ±0.79 MPa to 28.49 ±5.75 MPa. ANOVA revealed that reline material (P<.05), surface treatment (P<.05), and their interactions (P<.05) significantly affected the shear bond strength among the experimental groups. The strongest combination was Jet acrylic resin applied on specimens treated with airborne-particle abrasion and monomer. All 3 failure modalities (adhesive, cohesive, and mixed modes) were observed.ConclusionsOf the materials tested, the most reliable material to bond to milled polymethyl methacrylate was Jet acrylic resin, and the bond strength values were increased substantially when the milled polymethyl methacrylate surface was airborne-particle abraded and monomer was applied. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
