首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

高、低通量血液透析及联机血液透析滤过清除溶质的效果比较
引用本文:陈雄辉,李震生,吴培根,张涤华,沈清瑞,余学清.高、低通量血液透析及联机血液透析滤过清除溶质的效果比较[J].中华肾脏病杂志,2006,22(3):158-160.
作者姓名:陈雄辉  李震生  吴培根  张涤华  沈清瑞  余学清
作者单位:1. 510080,广州,中山大学附属第一医院肾内科
2. 河南省濮阳市中原油田总医院肾内科
摘    要:目的比较联机血液透析滤过(OL-HDF)、高通量血液透析(HF-HD)以及低通量血液透析(LF-HD)3种血液净化方式对尿毒症患者不同分子量毒素清除的效果。方法总共 25例长期常规血透患者进入本研究。所有患者分别接受上述3种方式血液净化治疗,每周3次,每次4 h,血流量230 ml/min,透析液流量500 ml/min。OL-HDF置换液为前稀释,流量150 ml/min, 平均置换液量36 L,透析液流量为700 ml/min,流经透析器透析液流量为550 ml/min。所有患者净脱水量根据病情需要约为体重的3%-5%。每1种方案治疗时间为4-6周,间隔2~3周,间隔期行常规HD治疗。测定治疗前后患者Scr、BUN及β2-MG、iPTH等水平,同时计算出其清除百分率。结果 LF-HD、HF-HD、OL-HDF治疗组Scr和BUN清除率分别为:72.4%±4.0%,70.6%±3%,71.7%±3.6%和75.1%±5%,73.0%±4%,76.2%±4%,3种治疗间的差异无统计学意义。血β2-MG及iPTH在LF-HD治疗前后无显著差异,而在HF-HD及OL-HDF组中,β2-MG治疗前后的清除率分别为32.5%±7%和44.2%±10%;iPTH清除率分别为42.7%±9.2%和54.4%± 8.8%,两组治疗前后溶质浓度及两组间清除率差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。结论 3种血液净化治疗方式对小分子溶质清除效果基本相似。LF-HD对相对分子质量大于9500的中大分子β2-MG、iPTH清除效果不明显,而HF-HD及OL-HDF能有效地清除上述两种中大分子溶质,其中OL-HDF的清除率更高

关 键 词:血液透析滤过  β2微球蛋白  甲状旁腺激素类
收稿时间:2005-09-20
修稿时间:2005-09-20

Comparison of the efficacy of removing solutes among on-line hemodiafiltration, low- and high-flux hemodialysis
CHEN Xiong-hui,LI Zhen-sheng,WU Pei-gen,ZHANG Di-hua,SHEN Qing-rui,YU Xue-qing.Comparison of the efficacy of removing solutes among on-line hemodiafiltration, low- and high-flux hemodialysis[J].Chinese Journal of Nephrology,2006,22(3):158-160.
Authors:CHEN Xiong-hui  LI Zhen-sheng  WU Pei-gen  ZHANG Di-hua  SHEN Qing-rui  YU Xue-qing
Institution:Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital ,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510080,China
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the impact of OL-HDF on in vivo removal of a wide spectrum of solutes (urea, creatinine, iPTH and β2-microglobulin) in comparison to LF-HD and HF-HD. Methods Twenty-five patients(17 men,8 women)were studied. Every patient underwent three dialysis sessions with routine HD parameters. Effects were compared among 1.8 m2 polysulfone LF-HD,1.8 m2 polysulfone HF-HD and OL-HDF. Predialysis and postdialysis solute concentrations were measured.The percentage of reduction ratios for each solute were calculated. Results Urea (molecular mass of 60 daltons)and creatinine(molecular mass of 113 daltons)reduction ratios were similar in LF-HD, HF-HD and OL-HDF. B2-microglobulim and iPTH reduction ratios for LF-HD were negligible. Mean β2-microglobalin reduction rates were 32.5%±7.0% for HF-HD versus 44.2%±10% for OL-HDF.(reinfusion volume mean 36 L/session; P < 0.05).Mean iPTH reduction rates were 42.7%±9.2% and 54.4%±8.8% for HF-HD and OL-HDF, respectively(P < 0.05).Conclusion Removal of solutes with small molecular weight is similar in three type therapies of hemopurification techniques. LF-HD does not seem to remove solutes with a molecular weight greater than 9500 daltons.OL-HDF provides marked enhancement of convection volume and enables a significant increase in β2-microglobulin and iPTH removal. β2-microaglobulin extraction is almost nil with LF-HD, better with HF-HD, and more effective with OL-HDF.
Keywords:Hemodiafiltration  β2-microglobulin  Parathyroid hormones  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华肾脏病杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华肾脏病杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号