Integrin expression in correlation to clinicopathological features and prognosis of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The prompt identification of patients with poor prognosis is essential in order to improve the treatment outcomes in prostate cancer (CaP); as a novel approach, several molecular markers, including integrins, have been discussed as prognostic biomarkers. Our aim was to comprehensively examine aberrant expression of integrins in correlation with clinicopathological features and prognosis in CaP by synthesizing all available evidence, in a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Scientific literature databases (Pubmed, Embase, and Scopus) were systematically searched until May 10, 2020. Random-effects (DerSimonian-Laird) models were used to estimate pooled odds ratios (ORs) for cross-sectional correlations with clinicopathological characteristics and relative risks for longitudinal associations with prognosis. Results: Fourteen studies were included with a total number of 3,194 CaP cases examined (13 cross-sectional and four longitudinal cohort study arms). Correlation of low expression of α₆ (pooled OR = 0.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.04–0.28, P < 0.001) and β₁ (pooled OR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.21–1.00, P = 0.049) integrin with high Gleason score was noted. A borderline trend between reduced expression of α₆ integrin and an advanced clinical stage of CaP (pooled OR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.22-1.03, P = 0.06) was observed. No associations with biochemical recurrence and survival were documented. Conclusions: Evidence on the association of low expression of integrins α₆ and β₁ and more advanced CaP exist, whereas significant results on survival were not documented; further studies are warranted.