首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

抗生素口服治疗小儿肺炎的可行性评价
引用本文:方利才. 抗生素口服治疗小儿肺炎的可行性评价[J]. 中国医药导报, 2010, 7(16): 82-83
作者姓名:方利才
作者单位:广东省潮州市妇幼保健院,广东潮州,521000
摘    要:目的:探讨抗生素口服途径治疗小儿肺炎的可行性、优越性。方法:在观察期间临床诊断为细菌性小儿肺炎的病例(非危重的,年龄6个月~5岁为主),随机分为抗生素口服观察组与抗生素静脉对照组,对病例的病情转归、不良反应、治疗过程患儿依从性等资料进行综合评价。结果:口服抗生素治疗小儿非严重肺炎与静脉使用抗生素的疗效差异无统计学意义,而小儿对治疗的依从性组间差异有统计学意义,口服途径有优势。结论:抗生素口服方法治疗非严重小儿肺炎是有效的,作为常规首选治疗非严重小儿肺炎的可行性、优越性更切合现行的医疗服务模式。

关 键 词:抗生素  肺炎  口服  小儿

The feasibility evaluation for oral antibiotic treatment of pediatric in children
FANG Licai. The feasibility evaluation for oral antibiotic treatment of pediatric in children[J]. China Medical Herald, 2010, 7(16): 82-83
Authors:FANG Licai
Affiliation:FANG Licai(Maternal and Child Health Hospital in Chaozhou City,Guangdong Province,Chaozhou 521000,China)
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the feasibility and advantages of oral antibiotic treatment of pediatric pneumonia. Methods:During the observation of clinical cases were diagnosed as bacterial pneumonia in children(non-critical,6 months to 5 years of age) ,they were divided into oral antibiotics observation group and intravenous antibiotics control group randomly,the condition,adverse reaction,compliance of the sick children in treatment process of patients were com-prehensively evaluated. Results:For non-severe pediatric pneumonia,the difference between oral antibiotics and intra-venous antibiotic treatment was not statistically significant,there were statistically significant in compliance of the sick children of two groups,oral antibiotic had advantages. Conclusion:For non-severe pediatric pneumonia,oral antibiotics cure is effective,as a regular first choice for treatment of non-severe pneumonia in children,its possibility and superiority is accord with the current medical model.
Keywords:Antibiotics  Pediatric  Oral  Children
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号