首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

多系统萎缩的认知功能障碍特点分析
引用本文:娄展,范磊,彭涛,岳秉宏.多系统萎缩的认知功能障碍特点分析[J].国际神经病学神经外科学杂志,2018,45(1):42-45,78.
作者姓名:娄展  范磊  彭涛  岳秉宏
作者单位:1. 河北北方学院附属第一医院神经内科, 河北省 张家口市 075000;2. 河北北方学院附属第一医院功能检查科, 河北省 张家口市 075000
摘    要:目的通过对多系统萎缩患者(MSA)进行认知功能评估,明确其是否存在认知功能障碍,并分析两种亚型(MSA-C型和MSA-P型)的认知功能障碍特点,以期为临床诊断提供参考。方法采用简易智能量表(MMSE)、蒙特利尔认知评估量表(Mo CA)和阿尔茨海默病评定量表-认知分量表(ADAS-cog)分别测评23例MSA患者(MSA-C型13例;MSA-P型10例)和25例健康志愿者的认知功能。结果 MSA组MMSE和Mo CA评分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);ADAS-cog评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。在视空间/执行能力、注意力、语言、抽象思维和延迟记忆方面,MSA组的Mo CA评分低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05);在记忆、语言和视空间/执行能力方面,MSA组的ADAS-cog评分高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。MSA-P型Mo CA评分低于MSA-C型,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);MSA-P型ADAS-cog评分高于MSA-C型,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);MSA-P型在抽象思维和延迟记忆两项目的评分低于MSA-C型,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);MSA-P型在记忆和视空间/执行能力方面的评分高于MSA-C型,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 MSA患者存在一定程度的认知功能障碍;MSA-P型认知损害较MSA-C型更加广泛和严重。

关 键 词:多系统萎缩  简易智能量表  蒙特利尔认知评估量表  阿尔茨海默病评定量表-认知分量表  
收稿时间:2017-09-11
修稿时间:2017/12/25 0:00:00

Features of cognitive impairment in multiple system atrophy
LOU Zhan,FAN Lei,PENG Tao,YUE Bing-Hong.Features of cognitive impairment in multiple system atrophy[J].Journal of International Neurology and Neurosurgery,2018,45(1):42-45,78.
Authors:LOU Zhan  FAN Lei  PENG Tao  YUE Bing-Hong
Institution:Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou, Hebei 075000, China
Abstract:Objective To investigate the cognitive function of patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA), the presence or absence of cognitive impairment, and the features of cognitive impairment in two subtypes (MSA-C type and MSA-P type), and to provide a reference for clinical diagnosis.Methods Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) were used to measure the cognitive function of 23 MSA patients (13 with MSA-C type and 10 with MSA-P type) and 25 healthy volunteers.Results Compared with the control group, the MSA group had significantly lower MMSE and MoCA scores and a significantly higher ADAS-cog score (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the MSA group had significantly lower scores on the subscales of visual space/executive ability, attention, language, abstract thinking, and delayed memory of MoCA (P<0.05), as well as significantly higher scores on the subscales of memory, language, and visual space/executive ability of ADAS-cog (P<0.05). Compared with those with MSA-C type, the patients with MSA-P type had a significantly lower MoCA score, a significantly higher ADAS-cog score, significantly lower scores on the subscales of abstract thinking and delayed memory, and significantly higher scores on the subscales of memory and visual space/executive ability (all P<0.05).Conclusions MSA patients have a certain degree of cognitive impairment, and patients with MSA-P type have more extensive and severer cognitive impairment than those with MSA-C type.
Keywords:multiple system atrophy  Mini-Mental State Examination  Montreal Cognitive Assessment  Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《国际神经病学神经外科学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《国际神经病学神经外科学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号