212例急性胰腺炎的临床疗效分析

目的 :评价治疗急性胰腺炎 5种方案的疗效。方法 :观察 5种治疗方案病人的临床症状及体征、血尿淀粉酶恢复正常和住院的时间来判定其疗效。结果 :5种治疗方案与对照组比较 ,其疗效有显著性差异 (P <0 0 1)。A、B、C、D四组间疗效无显著差异 (P >0 0 5 )。结论 :C、D两组各观察指标的时间较A、B两组短 ,其副作用少 ,易掌握 ,费用低 ,值得在基层医疗单位推广使用。E组疗效最佳 ,但费用较高 ,建议急性胰腺炎趋向于重症时 ,可提前使用 ,以缩短病程 ,降低并发症和死亡率。

A clincal therapy effect analysis of 212 acute pancreatitis

Object:To evaluate therapy effect of 5 kinds of treatment method on acute pancreatitis.Methods:To judge the therapy efect by observing times that the patient nausea,vomiting,upper abdominal pain and tenderness,blood and urinary amylase return to normal and in the hospital.Rusults:It are have obvious difference that 5 kinds of treatment compares with the contrast group(P＞0.01)；among A、B、C、D group in therapy effect are not have obvious difference(P＜0.05).Conclusion:To observe every item times in C、D group is tshorter than A、B group.Because its bad effects are relatively mild,to easy mast,and it are cheap,it can extensive apply in the basic hospital.The E group therapy effect is the best than the othe groups,but is is expencive.We suggest that can apply in addvance,when acute pancreatitis tends to serius,so that it can cut down the times in the hospital,and reduce death-rate and symptom-combine.