Comparison study of indirect MR arthrography and direct MR arthrography of the shoulder |
| |
Authors: | Jee Young Jung Young Cheol Yoon Sang-Kyu Yi Jaechul Yoo Bong-Keun Choe |
| |
Institution: | (1) Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, 50 Ilwon-dong, Kangnam-ku, Seoul, 135-710, Republic of Korea;(2) Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea;(3) Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea;(4) Present address: Sekye Radiologic Clinic, Daejeon, Republic of Korea |
| |
Abstract: | Objective To compare the diagnostic value of indirect magnetic resonance arthrography (I-MRA) with that of direct MR arthrography (D-MRA)
for labral tears, rotator cuff tears, and long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) tears using a 3-T MR unit.
Materials and methods Institutional review board approval was given; written informed consent was obtained from all patients. From November 2005
to June 2006, 19 patients (eight men and 11 women; mean age, 51 years) who had undergone both I-MRA and D-MRA underwent arthroscopic
surgery. Both methods were performed in fat-saturated axial, coronal oblique, and sagittal oblique T1-weighted sequences,
as well as axial and coronal oblique T2-weighted sequences. Two radiologists independently and retrospectively evaluated two
sets of MRA for the diagnosis of superior and anterior labral tears, subscapularis tendon (SSC), and supraspinatus–infraspinatus
tendon (SSP–ISP) tears, and LHBT tears. With the arthroscopic finding as a gold standard, we analyzed statistical differences
of sensitivities and specificities between two sets of MRA and inter-observer agreement was evaluated using the kappa value.
Results The sensitivity and specificity of I-MRA and D-MRA for reader 1 were 79/80% and 71/80%, respectively, for superior labral
tears; 100/100% and 100/100%, respectively, for anterior labral tears; 64/75% and 64/100%, respectively, for SSC tears; 100/86%
and 100/100%, respectively, for SSP–ISP tears; and 67/100% and 78/100%, respectively, for LHBT tears. Those of I-MRA and D-MRA
for reader 2 were 86/80% and 71/100%, respectively, for superior labral tears; 100/83% and 100/100%, respectively, for anterior
labral tears; 64/88% and 82/100%, respectively, for SSC tears; 92/86% and 100/100%, respectively, for SSP–ISP tears; and 78/90%
and 89/100%, respectively, for LHBT tears. No significant differences were found between the methods. Inter-observer agreements
were higher than moderate (κ > 0.41) with both methods.
Conclusions Based on a relatively small number of patients, no significant difference was detected between I-MRI and D-MRI with regard
rotator cuff, labral, and LHBT tears. |
| |
Keywords: | Magnetic resonance imaging Arthrography Comparative studies Shoulder |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|