首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

超声造影在肝恶性肿瘤介入治疗疗效评估中的应用价值
引用本文:吕珂,姜玉新,戴晴,朱庆莉,谭莉,夏宇,孟华,高嫔.超声造影在肝恶性肿瘤介入治疗疗效评估中的应用价值[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(1):98-101.
作者姓名:吕珂  姜玉新  戴晴  朱庆莉  谭莉  夏宇  孟华  高嫔
作者单位:中国医学科学院中国协和医科大学北京协和医院超声科,北京,100730
摘    要:目的观察肝恶性肿瘤介入治疗后超声造影表现,并与其他影像学方法比较,评估其对介入治疗疗效判定的临床应用价值。方法评估介入治疗疗效66例次,病灶78个,介入治疗后均行超声造影检查及同期CT/MRI/DSA检查(超声造影前后2周内),包括经肝动脉插管栓塞化疗(TACE)38例次46个病灶,射频(RF)消融治疗13例次15个病灶,经皮乙醇注射(PEI)治疗15例次17个病灶。超声造影显像将病灶分为有增强和无增强两类。结果介入治疗后,超声造影显示44个病灶(56.4%)动脉相局部增强区,34个病灶无增强。同期CT/MRI/DSA诊断41个病灶(52.6%)有肿瘤复发/残存,以后者为对照,实时谐波超声造影评估肝恶性肿瘤介入治疗疗效的敏感性为87.8%,特异性为78.4%,符合率为83.3%。TACE、RF、PEI三种肝脏恶性肿瘤治疗方式中,超声造影对TACE治疗后疗效评估的敏感性、特异性及符合率最高,分别为92.0%,85.7%,89.1%。结论超声造影可以作为肝脏恶性肿瘤介入治疗疗效评估的可靠方法,且更适于TA-CE治疗后的疗效评价。

关 键 词:肝肿瘤  介入性超声  造影剂  谐波成像
文章编号:1003-3289(2007)01-0098-04
收稿时间:2006-09-07
修稿时间:2006-09-072006-11-02

Therapeutic effects of malignant hepatic masses treated by interventional procedures: usefulness of contrast-enhanced harmonic ultrasound imaging
LV Ke,JIANG Yu-xin,DAI Qing,ZHU Qing-li,TAN Li,XIA Yu,MENG Hua and GAO Pin.Therapeutic effects of malignant hepatic masses treated by interventional procedures: usefulness of contrast-enhanced harmonic ultrasound imaging[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology,2007,23(1):98-101.
Authors:LV Ke  JIANG Yu-xin  DAI Qing  ZHU Qing-li  TAN Li  XIA Yu  MENG Hua and GAO Pin
Institution:Department of Ultrasound, PUMC Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
Abstract:Objective To observe the findings and assess the usefulness of contrast-enhanced harmonic ultrasonographic imaging in evaluating the therapeutic effects of malignant hepatic masses to treatment with interventional procedures. Methods Sixty-six examinations on 78 malignant hepatic masses underwent harmonic ultrasonographic imaging using the microbubble contrast agent SonoVue after interventional procedures treatment. The results of contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging were compared with those of contrast-enhanced CT/MRI and DSA less than 2 weeks before or after contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging obtained. The therapeutic methods used to treat the malignant hepatic masses were TACE (38 examinations, 46 masses), RF ablation (13 examinations, 15 masses) and PEI (15 examinations, 17 masses). The criteria of contrast-enhanced harmonic ultrasound imaging used to determine the residual, inadequately treated tumors were based on the presence or absence of hypervascular enhancement. Results After treatment, studies using contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging identified residual tumor enhancement in 44(56.4%) of 78 lesions and did not identify enhancement in any of the remaining 34 lesions. Follow-up CT/MRI/DSA revealed incomplete tumor responses in 41(52.6%) of 78 cases after the therapeutic procedures. Compared with CT/MRI/DSA, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging were 87.8%, 78.4% and 83.3%. For detecting viable tumors, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging after TACE were higher than those of imaging after RF or PEI. Conclusion Preliminary data suggests that contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging can be a useful and effective technique for evaluating the therapeutic effects of malignant hepatic masses and more suitable for detecting viable tumors after TACE.
Keywords:Liver neoplasms  Interventional ultrasound  Contrast agent  Harmonic imaging
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国医学影像技术》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国医学影像技术》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号