首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Threshold and non-threshold chemical carcinogens: A survey of the present regulatory landscape
Institution:1. Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc., 50 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, 07677, USA;2. Member Expert Panel for Fragrance Safety, Columbia University Medical Center, Department of Dermatology, 161 Fort Washington Ave., New York, NY, 10032, USA;3. Member Expert Panel for Fragrance Safety, Malmo University Hospital, Department of Occupational & Environmental Dermatology, Sodra Forstadsgatan 101, Entrance 47, Malmo, SE-20502, Sweden;4. Member Expert Panel for Fragrance Safety, School of Natural Resources & Environment, University of Michigan, Dana Building G110, 440 Church St., Ann Arbor, MI, 58109, USA;5. Member Expert Panel for Fragrance Safety, University of Sao Paulo, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Department of Pathology, Av. Prof. dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87, Sao Paulo, CEP, 05508-900, Brazil;6. Member Expert Panel for Fragrance Safety, University of Wuerzburg, Department of Toxicology, Versbacher Str. 9, 97078, Würzburg, Germany;7. Member Expert Panel for Fragrance Safety, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, USA;8. Member Expert Panel for Fragrance Safety, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, Center in Molecular Toxicology, 638 Robinson Research Building, 2200 Pierce Avenue, Nashville, TN, 37232-0146, USA;9. Member of Expert Panel for Fragrance Safety, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Center of Excellence in Environmental Toxicology, 1316 Biomedical Research Building (BRB) II/III, 421 Curie Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-3083, USA;10. Member Expert Panel for Fragrance Safety, The University of Tennessee, College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Comparative Medicine, 2407 River Dr., Knoxville, TN, 37996- 4500, USA;11. Member Expert Panel for Fragrance Safety, Department of Pharmacology, University of Arizona, College of Medicine, 1501 North Campbell Avenue, P.O. Box 245050, Tucson, AZ, 85724-5050, USA;12. Member Expert Panel for Fragrance Safety, The Journal of Dermatological Science (JDS), Department of Dermatology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan;1. ExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc., Annandale, NJ, USA;2. EpiSolutions LLC, Melbourne, FL, USA;3. Shell International B.V. The Hague, the Netherlands;4. Total Refining and Chemicals, Feluy, Belgium;5. Penman Consulting Limited, Wantage, UK;1. ExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc., US Highway 22 East, Annandale, NJ, 08801 USA;2. Shell International B.V., The Netherlands;3. SABIC Europe B.V., Belgium;4. EpiSolutions, LLC, USA;5. BASF SE, Germany;6. Penman Consulting, Ltd., UK;1. F. Hoffmann La Roche Ltd., Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Science, Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland;2. BASF SE Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany;3. Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine ITEM, Hannover, Germany;4. Department of Chemistry, Division of Food Chemistry and Toxicology, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany;5. Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Preclinical Safety, Basel, Switzerland;6. Institute of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany;7. Institute of Toxicology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany;8. The Procter & Gamble Company, Global Product Stewardship, Human Safety, Mason, OH, USA;9. DLAC Dienstleistungsagentur Chemie GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany;10. Bayer HealthCare, Investigational Toxicology, Berlin, Germany;11. Ferderal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devises—Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte (BfArM), Genetic and Reproductive Toxicology, Bonn, Germany;1. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;2. Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing 100031, China
Abstract:For the proper regulation of a carcinogenic material it is necessary to fully understand its mode of action, and in particular whether it demonstrates a threshold of effect. This paper explores our present understanding of carcinogenicity and the mechanisms underlying the carcinogenic response. The concepts of genotoxic and non-genotoxic and threshold and non-threshold carcinogens are fully described. We provide summary tables of the types of cancer considered to be associated with exposure to a number of carcinogens and the available evidence relating to whether carcinogenicity occurs through a threshold or non-threshold mechanism. In light of these observations we consider how different regulatory bodies approach the question of chemical carcinogenesis, looking in particular at the definitions and methodologies used to derive Occupational Exposure Levels (OELs) for carcinogens. We conclude that unless proper differentiation is made between threshold and non-threshold carcinogens, inappropriate risk management measures may be put in place - and lead also to difficulties in translating carcinogenicity research findings into appropriate health policies. We recommend that clear differentiation between threshold and non-threshold carcinogens should be made by all expert groups and regulatory bodies dealing with carcinogen classification and risk assessment.
Keywords:Threshold  Non-threshold  Carcinogen  Regulation  Guideline values  Classification  Risk assessment  OELs
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号