盆底重建术治疗女性盆底功能障碍的临床效果

目的探讨盆底重建术治疗女性盆底功能障碍的临床效果。方法选择我院收治的78例女性盆底功能障碍患者为研究对象,采用简单随机法将其分为对照组和观察组,各39例。对照组实施传统手术,观察组实施盆底重建术治疗。比较两组患者的临床疗效。结果观察组患者治疗总有效率显著高于对照组,并发症总发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组术中出血量少于对照组,手术时间及尿管留置时间均短于对照组(P<0.05)。两组患者手术后及末次随访PFDI-20评分较手术前均显著降低,且观察组末次随访PFDI-20评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论相较于传统的手术治疗,盆底重建术治疗女性盆底功能障碍效果更佳,且并发症少,推荐推广。

Clinical effect of pelvic floor reconstruction in the treatment of female pelvic floor dysfunction

Objective To investigate the clinical effect of pelvic floor reconstruction in the treatment of female pelvic floor dysfunction.Methods Seventy-eight female patients with pelvic floor dysfunction admitted in our hospital were selected as study objects and divided into control group and observation group by simple random method, with 39 cases in each group.The control group was treated with traditional surgery, while the observation group was treated with pelvic floor reconstruction.The clinical effects of the two groups were compared.Results The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group, and the total incidence of complications was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The intraoperative blood loss in the observation group was less than that in the control group, and the operation time and indwelling time of urinary catheter were shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05).After operation and at the last follow-up, the PFDI-20 scores of the two groups were significantly lower than those before operation, and the PFDI-20 score at the last follow-up in the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with the traditional surgery, pelvic floor reconstruction is more effective in the treatment of female pelvic floor dysfunction, which has fewer complications.It is recommended to be popularized.