首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Optimal acupoint and session of acupuncture for patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a meta-analysis
Authors:Wei Zhang  Yu Fang  Minfeng Shi  Mingzhen Zhang  Yuangui Chen  Tie Zhou
Institution:1.Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China;2.Reproductive Center, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China;3.Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China;4.WMU-Monash University BDI Alliance in Clinical & Experimental Biomedicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China;5.Hongkou Branch, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
Abstract:BackgroundThe study aims to perform a meta-analysis of published trials and evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture on chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) by symptom score reduction, optimal acupuncture session, and most frequently used acupoints.MethodsA literature search was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing efficacy of acupuncture with sham acupuncture or standard medication on CP/CPPS. The primary outcome was the reduction of National Institute of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Index (NIH-CPSI) total score and its subscales. The optimal acupuncture session to reach its clinical efficacy and most common compatibility rule of acupoints were also evaluated.ResultsTen trials involving 770 participants were included. Meta-analysis showed compared with sham acupuncture, acupuncture yielded significant reduction in NIH-CPSI total score weighted mean difference (WMD): 7.28, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 5.69–8.86), and provided better pain relief (WMD: 3.57, 95% CI: 2.07–5.08), urinary symptoms improvement (WMD: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.13–2.22), and quality of life (QOL) (WMD: 2.38, 95% CI: 1.41–3.36). Compared with standard medication, acupuncture were more efficacious in reducing NIH-CPSI total score (WMD: 3.36, 95% CI: 1.27–5.45), also showed significant greater pain relief (WMD: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.67–3.06), marginal advantage in improving QOL (WMD: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.12–1.83) but no difference in reducing urinary symptom (WMD: −0.03, 95% CI: −1.30 to 1.24). Four acupuncture sessions were the minimum “dose” to reach clinical efficacy, and prolonged acupuncture sessions continuously improved urinary symptoms and QOL. The majority of acupoint selection strategies were based on the combination of any three acupoints from CV3, CV4, BL32, SP6, and SP9.ConclusionsAcupuncture has promising efficacy for patients with CP/CPPS, especially category IIIB, in aspects of relieving pain and urinary symptoms and improving the QOL. Acupuncture may serve as a standard treatment option when available, and a tailored comprehensive treatment strategy for CP/CPPS is the future trend.
Keywords:Acupuncture  chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS)  National Institute of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Index (NIH-CPSI)  acupuncture session  acupoint selection
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号