Preparation of Ni-microsphere and Cu-MOF using aspartic acid as coordinating ligand and study of their catalytic properties in Stille and sulfoxidation reactions

In this study, the thermal and catalytic behavior of Ni-microsphere and Cu-MOF were investigated with aspartic acid as the coordinating ligand with different morphologies. The Ni-microsphere and Cu-MOF with aspartic acid, as the coordinating ligand, were prepared via a solvothermal method. The morphology and porosity of the obtained Ni microsphere and Cu-MOF were characterized by XRD, FTIR, TGA, DSC, BET and SEM techniques. The catalytic activity of the Ni-microsphere and Cu-MOF was examined in Stille and sulfoxidation reactions. The Ni microsphere and Cu-MOF were easily isolated from the reaction mixtures by simple filtration and then recycled four times without any reduction of catalytic efficiency.

In this study, the thermal and catalytic behavior of Ni-microsphere and Cu-MOF were investigated with aspartic acid as the coordinating ligand with different morphologies.

Cross-coupling reaction is one of the most significant methods to create carbon–carbon bonds in organic synthesis. There are many approaches, including, Suzuki, Stille, and Sonogashira cross-coupling reactions, which are well recognized and highly applicable in organic synthesis. Among them, the Stille reaction, which is an increasingly versatile tool for the formation of carbon–carbon bonds, involves the coupling of aryl halides with organotin reagents.¹ However, these reactions generally require expensive transition metal catalysts such as Pd.² Therefore, it is necessary to develop a new economic, green, and efficient methodology to reduce the environmental impact of the reaction. They are also important intermediates in organic chemistry and have been widely used as ligands in catalysis. The direct oxidation of sulfides is an important method in organic chemistry. Besides, they are also valuable synthetic intermediates for the construction of chemically and biologically important molecules, which usually synthesized by transition metal complexes.³ In this regard, different transition metal complexes of mercury(ii) oxide/iodine,⁴ oxo(salen) chromium(v),⁵ rhenium(v) oxo,⁶ H₅IO₆/FeCl₃,⁷ Na₂WO₄/C₆H₅PO₃H₂,⁸ chlorites and bromites,⁹ NBS¹⁰etc. have been introduced as catalysts. However, these catalysts have several drawbacks; including, separation problems from the reaction medium, harsh reaction conditions, and generating a lot of waste. In order to solve these drawbacks, of separation and isolation of expensive homogeneous catalysts is the heterogenization of homogeneous catalysts and generation of a new heterogeneous catalytic system. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are a class of porous crystalline materials, which show great advantages, i.e. their enormous structural and chemical diversity in terms of high surface area,^11,12 pore volumes,¹³ high thermal,¹⁴ and chemical stabilities,¹⁵ various pore dimensions/topologies, and capabilities to be designed and modified after preparation.¹⁶ In this sense, it is worth mentioning that these features would result in viewing these solids as suitable heterogeneous catalysts for organic transformations.^17–22 MOFs materials are prepared using metal ions (or clusters) and organic ligands in solutions (i.e. solvothermal or hydrothermal synthesis). MOF structures are affected by metal and organic ligands, leading to have more than 20 000 different MOFs with the largest pore aperture (98 Å) and lowest density (0.13 g cm⁻³).²³ Generally, surface area and pore properties of MOFs seem quite dependent on their metal and ligand type as well as synthesis conditions and the applied post-synthesis modifications. The largest surface area was measured in Al-MOF (1323.67 m² g⁻¹)^24,25 followed by ZIF-8-MOF (1039.09 m² g⁻¹),²⁶ while the lowest value was with Zn-MOF (0.86 m² g⁻¹),²⁷ followed by γ-CD-MOF (1.18 m² g⁻¹)²⁸ and Fe₃O(BDC)₃ (7.6 m² g⁻¹).²⁹ Microspheres are either microcapsule or monolithic particles, with diameters in the range (typically from 1 μm to 1000 μm),²⁹ depending on the encapsulation of active drug moieties. In this regard, there are two types of microspheres: microcapsules, defined, as spherical particles in the size range of about 50 nm to 2 mm and micro matrices.³⁰ Microsphere structures have recently attracted much attention due to their unique properties, such as large surface area,³¹ which make them suitable for tissue regenerative medicine,³²i.e. as cell culture scaffolds,³³ drug-controlled release carriers³⁴ and heterogeneous catalysis.³⁵ Many chemical synthetic methods has been developed for their synthesis, including seed swelling,³⁶ hydrothermal or solvothermal methods,³⁶ polymerization,³⁷ spray drying³⁸ and phase separation.³⁹ Among these methods, the solvothermal synthesis has been used as the most suitable methodology to prepare a variety of nanostructural materials, such as wire, rod,⁴⁰ fiber,⁴¹ mof⁴² and microsphere.⁴³ In this sense, the synthesis process involves the use of a solvent under unusual conditions of high pressure and high temperature.⁴⁴ The properties of microspheres are highly dependent on the number of pores, pore diameter and structure of pore.⁴⁵ The degree of porosity depends on various factors such as temperature, pH, stirring speed, type, and concentration of porogen, polymer, and its concentration.⁴⁶ There have been numerous studies to investigate the coordination behavior of a ligand with different metals under the same conditions.^47–49 Herein, we aim at comparing the catalytic behavior of Ni-microsphere and Cu-MOF with aspartic acid as the coordinating ligand in Stille and sulfoxidation reactions (Scheme 1).Open in a separate windowScheme 1(a) Schematic synthesis of Ni microsphere and Cu-MOF and their application as catalyst (b) topological structure of Cu-MOF (c) topological of Ni microsphere.