Olecranon fractures: different surgical techniques

Numerous systems of osteosynthesis of olecranon fractures are avaible. The numero-ulnar articulation badly bears the smallest incongruence and easily faces rigidity. Therefore the aim of therapy is the anatomical and permanent reconstruction of the articular surface of the olecranon, in order to mobilize the elbow as soon as possible. We analyzed 85 olecranon fractures, classified according to Merle d'Aubignè and treated with two different surgical techniques (intramedullart screw and AO tension band wiring technique). The results were compared at an average follow-up of 88 months. Excellent clinical results were obtained in 74,12%, good in 29.00%, sufficient 3,53%, insufficient in 2,35% of patients, with a mean of recovery in 2 months and only 2 cases of pseudoarthrosis (with dynamic procedure). Objective results were similar for two techniques adopted, whereas the subjective results in patients with screw. The screw is more suitable in medio-olecranic and basis-olecranic fractures, while the dynamic procedure gives better results in fractures of the apex of olecranon and comminute fracture. Tolerance of the intramedullary screw has generally proved to be better (65% of cases), while the dynamic assembling has been removed in most cases after fracture consolidation. Periarticular calcifications correlated with the type of fracture (e. g. comminuted, associated) rather than with the means of synthesis employed. Received: 8 February 2001/Accepted: 4 September 2001