中外学术论文与期刊的宏观差距分析及改进建议

【目的】 通过对比分析中外学术论文与期刊,更好地了解我国科学高质量发展道路上的优势和短板,并提出优化策略,助力建设现代化科技强国。【方法】 基于Web of Science数据库分别对中美英德法日六个主要科技大国在不同学科方向的SCI、SSCI论文和期刊的数量与质量进行对比分析。【结果】 一方面,我国在化学、数学、计算机科学、材料科学和工程学科的学术论文成果及国际影响力突出,但在医学和社会科学学科还有待提升;另一方面,我国各个学科的学术期刊发展水平明显落后于美国,相对于目前科研水平明显滞后。【结论】 我国应鼓励发表高水平论文;补齐短板、谋划未来;向美英学习,加快建设一流国际期刊。

Macro gap on academic papers and journals between China and foreign countries and suggestions for improvement

[Purposes] This paper aims to compare the academic papers and journals between China and other countries, summarize the advantages and disadvantages in Chinese scienpngic and technological development, and put forward constructive strategies, which is expected to enhance the scienpngic and technological development in China. [Methods] On the basis of Web of Science, we compared the quantity and quality of SCI and SSCI academic papers and journals on different disciplines among six major countries—China, the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, and Japan. [Findings] China's academic outcomes in and international influence of papers on chemistry, mathematics, computer science, materials science, and engineering science are outstanding, while the products in medical science and social science are obviously insufficient. The development of academic journals in China obviously falls behind that in the United States, and also does not match the overall output of China's scienpngic research. [Conclusions] We should encourage the publication of high-quality papers and make up the gap by learning from the United States and the United Kingdom so as to speed up the construction of world-class international journals.