中文科技期刊四封编排规范性调研分析——基于中国科学院主管的中文科技期刊

【目的】 通过对中国科学院主管的中文科技期刊四封的编排规范性进行调研,找出科技期刊四封标注项目现存问题,为提升我国科技期刊四封编排质量提供依据。 【方法】 在文献调研及对照国家有关四封编排格式规定的基础上, 初拟了中文科技期刊四封编排规范性审核表;之后采用专家咨询法对该表进行优化,最终确定中文科技期刊四封审核表的各项内容,并使用该表对中国科学院主管的2019年出版的中文科技期刊四封编排规范性进行调研和分析。 【结果】 中文科技期刊四封编排的不规范主要表现为封一未标注出版单位,版权块中CN号字号不规范,刊有广告的期刊未标注“广告发布登记”或标注错误等。 【结论】 通过对中国科学院科技期刊全样本调研,可以推断我国科技期刊四封编排,尤其是封一和版权块标注内容的规范性亟待全面提升,以充分发挥期刊的整体功能。

A survey of the editing and typesetting of Chinese scientific journals' four covers: Based on Chinese scientific journals managed by Chinese Academy of Sciences

Purposes] Through a survey of the editing and typesetting of four covers of Chinese scientific journals (CSJs) managed by Chinese Academy of Sciences, this study finds out the problems on the necessary elements on four covers, which lays a basis for improving the editing and typesetting quality of CSJs' four covers. Methods] With literature research method and reference to national regulations related to four covers, we drafted a table for investigating the editing and typesetting of CSJs' four covers, optimized it through expert consultation, and employed it to survey and analyze the four covers of CSJs (published in 2019) managed by Chinese Academy of Sciences. Findings] The non-standards on the four covers of CSJs mainly include no information of the publisher on the front cover, wrong font size for CN number, and no label or incorrect label of "advertisement release and registration" on journals with advertisements. Conclusions] Through the survey of journals managed by Chinese Academy of Sciences, we conclude that the editing and typesetting of four covers of CSJs, especially the front cover and copyright page, should be further improved in an all-round way to enhance the overall functions of journals.