首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


The role of the 2011 patients' rights in cross-border health care directive in shaping seven national health systems: Looking beyond patient mobility
Institution:1. Department of Health Services Management, Faculty of Health Science University of Malta, Department of International Health, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands;2. European Social Observatory (OSE), Belgium;3. Department of International Health, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands;4. Ministry of Social Affairs, Tallinn, Estonia;5. National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Department of Health and Social Care Systems, Helsinki, Finland;6. University of Tampere, Faculty of Social Sciences, Finland;7. Jagiellonian University, Medical College, Faculty of Health Science, Kraków, Poland;8. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), UK;9. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Berlin University of Technology, Germany
Abstract:Reports on the implementation of the Directive on the application of Patients' Rights in Cross-border Healthcare indicate that it had little impact on the numbers of patients seeking care abroad. We set out to explore the effects of this directive on health systems in seven EU Member States. Key informants in Belgium, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Malta, Poland and The Netherlands filled out a structured questionnaire. Findings indicate that the impact of the directive varied between countries and was smaller in countries where a large degree of adaptation had already taken place in response to the European Court of Justice Rulings. The main reforms reported include a heightened emphasis on patient rights and the adoption of explicit benefits packages and tariffs. Countries may be facing increased pressure to treat patients within a medically justifiable time limit. The implementation of professional liability insurance, in countries where this did not previously exist, may also bring benefits for patients. Lowering of reimbursement tariffs to dissuade patients from seeking treatment abroad has been reported in Poland. The issue of discrimination against non-contracted domestic private providers in Estonia, Finland, Malta and The Netherlands remains largely unresolved. We conclude that evidence showing that patients using domestic health systems have actually benefitted from the directive remains scarce and further monitoring over a longer period of time is recommended.
Keywords:Cross-border health care  European union  Patients' rights  Health system  Health policy
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号