父母养育方式、人格特征与大学生生存质量关系的结构方程模型

目的 探讨父母养育方式、人格特征与大学生生存质量的关系.方法 采用分层整群抽样方法,用世界卫生组织生存质量量表简表中文版(WHOQOL-BREF)、父母养育方式评价量表(Egma Minnen av Bardndosnauppforstran,EMBU)和艾森克人格问卷(Eysenck Personality Questionnaire,EPQ)对某市综合性大学1306名大学生进行测评,然后用结构方程模型分析软件Amos(Analysis of Moment Structures) 7.0建立结构方程模型.结果 结构方程模型分析结果显示,父母情感温暖对内外倾维度有直接(正向)影响(β=0.261,P ＜0.05)、对病态人格有直接(负向)影响(β=-0.295,P ＜0.05);父母不良养育方式(惩罚严厉、过分干涉、拒绝否认和过度保护)、父母偏爱被试对病态人格有直接(正向)影响(分别β=0.456, β=0.132,P ＜0.05);内外倾维度对生存质量有直接(正向)影响(β=0.300,P ＜0.05);病态人格对生存质量有直接(负向)影响(β=-0.617,P ＜0.05);父母情感温暖通过内外倾途径和病态人格途径间接影响生存质量(β=0.260,P ＜0.05);父母不良养育方式、父母偏爱被试可通过病态人格途径间接影响生存质量(分别β=-0.281,β=-0.081,均P ＜0.05).结论 父母养育方式对大学生的生存质量可能有间接影响;人格特征对大学生的生存质量可能有直接影响,人格特征作为"中介变量"调节父母养育方式与大学生生存质量的关系.

A structural eguation modeling on the relationships between parental rearing patterns,personality characteristics and quality of life in college students

Objective To explore the relationships between parental rearing patterns,personality characteristics and quality of life (QOL) in college students. Methods Through cluster-stratified sampling, 1306 students in Changsha were investigated using the Chinese version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Scale ( WHOQOL-BREF ), the Egma Minnen av Bardndosnauppforstran ( EMBU ) and Eysenck Personality Questionnaire(EPQ ). A structural equation modeling ( SEM ) was applied by AMOS ( Analysis of Moment Structures ) version 7.0. Results The SEM showed that parental emotional warmth of EMBU had directly positive effect on introversion-extroversion dimension of EPQ(β=0.261,P ＜0.05)and directly negative effect on morbid personality ( neuroticism, psychoticism ) of EPQ(β=-0.295, P ＜0.05).The mal-parental rearing patterns( strict punishment, over-interference, rejection and denial, over-protection ) and parental preference of EMBU had directly positive effects on morbid personality (β=0.456,β=0.132, respectively, all P ＜0.05). The introversion-extroversion dimension of EPQ had directly positive effect on QOL(β=0.300,P ＜0.05). The morbid personality had directly negative effect on QOL(β=-0.617,P ＜0.05). The parental emotional warmth had indirect effects on QOL through introversion-extroversion dimension and morbid personality path (β=0.260, P ＜0.05). The mal-parental rearing patterns and parental preference of EMBU had indirect effects on QOL through morbid personality path(β=-0.281,β=-0.081,respectively,all P ＜0.05). Conclusion Parental rearing patterns may have indirect effects on QOL of college students. Personality characteristics may have direct effects on QOL of college students. Personality characteristics as a mediated variable mediates the relationships between parental rearing patterns and QOL of college students.