Experiences, knowledge, and opinions on palliative care among Romanian general practitioners

Aim

To assess experience, knowledge, and opinions of Romanian general practitioners (GPs) on palliative health care in Romania.

Methods

A questionnaire survey was performed among 1283 GPs in five districts of Romania in 2004. The data were collected on the GPs’ self-assessed experience in, knowledge of, and opinion on palliative care, entered into a database, and analyzed. The GPs were also asked to indicate if they needed to improve their knowledge about palliative care.

Results

The response rate was 71%. GPs mostly reported having limited experience in providing palliative care, with 24% reporting to have provided palliative care frequently, and 55% reporting to have it provided sometimes. Significant correlations were found between the GPs’ experience in palliative care provision and their age, sex, and place of work. The majority of Romanian GPs reported that their medical knowledge was inadequate for the provision of care to terminal patients at home. Over 80% of GPs agreed to develop palliative care services and to participate in a training program.

Conclusion

GPs in Romania reported to recognize the need for improvement of palliative care delivery in their country. They expressed the need for better knowledge of palliative care and agreed that multidisciplinary teams to provide palliative care at home would be the best form of delivering this type of health care.Palliative care is a relatively new form of health care provision in Central-Eastern European (CEE) countries unlike in Western Europe, where it has been an established health care specialty for decades (1,2). The most widely used model of palliative care provision in CEE countries is the hospice model. However, the number and availability of hospices and financial means allocated to these institutions have been insufficient, and the population in need of palliative care has been increasing. Palliative care professionals are less focused on the needs of patients and possible development of a new model for palliative care provision than they are on the “vested interests” of the model, ie, preventing the hospices in which they work from being closed down.With aging of the population, the morbidity profile in CEE countries has changed and so have the health care needs. The need for nursing and care, including palliative care, is increasing and largely uneven distribution of medical care facilities between urban and rural areas only aggravates the problem. All these factors bring the palliative care issues to focus (3).Until recently, palliative care in Romania and many CEE countries was primarily associated with terminal care of patients with cancer and the hospice movement (4,5). In the last few years, however, the hospice model as a preferred model of palliative care has been reevaluated and questioned by many (3). Because of the over-institutionalization of health care and the decrease in the number of hospital beds, health care policymakers are increasingly thinking about promoting palliative care at home, which would be supported by a palliative care team (1). Furthermore, people in most CEE countries prefer to die at home, as there is still a strong tradition of family care (6).The expectation of the Romanian primary health care system, which includes general practitioners (GPs) and nurses, to play an important role in palliative care at home is relatively far from realization. Not only that this aspect of health care provision is new and partly unknown to great majority of GPs, but the complementary services and expertise in home care and pain management are not well developed either. This problem is also present in Croatia, Hungary, and Slovakia (1), where various initiatives are being taken to develop palliative care as the need for it increases. As Doyle et al (7) have stated, palliative care at home is dependent on the attitudes and perceptions of family physicians and wider socio-cultural attitudes. Also, the lack of information on the latest techniques and developments in palliative care may prohibit the development of that health care area (8).The first hospices in Romania were established in Oradea and Brasov (9); by 2004, five hospices had been opened. Although a government policy from 1998 tried to strengthen the role of the GP in the health care delivery system (10), no systematic attention had been given to palliative care in general practice or hospitals until 2002 (4). Thereafter, family physicians have increasingly started to provide palliative care, but they have not been reimbursed for the service. Thus, it may be said that the efforts to develop a system of palliative care provision in Romania are still not organized.We asked GPs in five districts in Romania to self-assess their experience in palliative care provision, their knowledge and need for better education in palliative care, and their opinion on the best way to deliver this type of care.