首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Imaging assessment of bone quality in osteoporosis
Authors:Harry K. Genant MD  J. Yebin Jiang MD   PhD
Affiliation:(1) Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA;(2) Osteoporosis and Arthritis Lab, Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Abstract:Noninvasive and/or nondestructive techniques can provide structural information about bone beyond simple bone densitometry. Although bone densitometry provides important information about osteoporotic fracture risk, many studies indicate that bone mineral density only partly explains bone strength. Quantitative assessment of macrostructural characteristics, such as geometry, and microstructural features, such as relative trabecular volume, trabecular spacing, and connectivity, may improve the ability to estimate bone strength. Methods for quantitatively assessing macrostructure include (besides conventional radiographs) dualenergy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and computed tomography (CT), particularly volumetric quantitative computed tomography (vQCT). Methods for assessing microstructure of trabecular bone noninvasively and/or nondestructively include high-resolution computed tomography (hrCT), microcomputed tomography (μCT), high-resolution magnetic resonance (hrMR), and micromagnetic resonance μMR. Volumetric QCT, hrCT, and hrMR are generally applicable in vivo; μCT and μMR are principally applicable in vitro. Despite progress, problems remain. The important balances between spatial resolution and sampling size, or between signal-to-noise and radiation dose or acquisition time, need further consideration, as do the complexity and expense of the methods vs their availability and accessibility. Clinically, the challenges for bone imaging include balancing the advantages of simple bone densitometry vs the more complex architectural features of bone or the deeper research requirements vs the broader clinical needs. The biological differences between the peripheral appendicular skeleton and the central axial skeleton must be further addressed. Finally, the relative merits of these sophisticated imaging techniques must be weighed with respect to their applications as diagnostic procedures, requiring high accuracy or reliability, vs their monitoring applications requiring high precision or reproducibility.
Keywords:Imaging  osteoporosis  dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry  computed tomography  volumetric quantitative computed tomography  high-resolution computed tomography  microcomputed tomography  MR microscopy
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号